The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2022
Inhaled Epoprostenol and Milrinone Effect on Right Ventricular Pressure Waveform Monitoring.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Elmi-Sarabi Mahsa, Couture Etienne, Jarry Stéphanie, Saade Elena, Calderone Alexander, Potes Cristhian, Denault André
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction are major complications in cardiac surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the change in RV pressure waveform in patients receiving a combination of inhaled epoprostenol and inhaled milrinone (iE&iM) before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and to assess the safety of this approach with a matched case-control group.
METHODS: A prospective single-centre cohort study of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery administered iE&iM through an ultrasonic mesh nebulizer. RV pressure waveform monitoring was obtained by continuously transducing the RV port of the pulmonary artery (PA) catheter.
RESULTS: The final analysis included 26 patients receiving iE&iM. There was a significant drop in mean PA pressure (MPAP) (-4.8 ± 8.7, P = 0.010), systolic PA pressure (SPAP) (-8.2 ± 12.8, P = 0.003), RV end-diastolic pressure (RVEDP) (-2.1 ± 2.8, P < 0.001) and RV diastolic pressure gradient (RVDPG) (-1.7 ± 1.4, P < 0.001) after 17 ± 9 minutes of iE&iM administration. Patients also had a significant increase in RV outflow tract (RVOT) gradient (3.7 ± 4.7, P < 0.001), RV maximal rate of pressure rise during early systole (dP/dt max) (68.3 ± 144.7, P = 0.024), and left ventricular (LV) dP/dt max (66.4 ± 90.1, P < 0.001). Change in RVOT gradient was only observed in those with a positive pulmonary vasodilator response to treatment. Treatment with iE&iM did not present adverse effects when compared with a matched case-control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of iE&iM in cardiac surgery patients presenting with PH or signs of RV dysfunction is a safe and effective treatment approach in improving RV function. Appearance of a transient increase in RVOT gradient after iE&iM could be useful to predict response to treatment.
METHODS: A prospective single-centre cohort study of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery administered iE&iM through an ultrasonic mesh nebulizer. RV pressure waveform monitoring was obtained by continuously transducing the RV port of the pulmonary artery (PA) catheter.
RESULTS: The final analysis included 26 patients receiving iE&iM. There was a significant drop in mean PA pressure (MPAP) (-4.8 ± 8.7, P = 0.010), systolic PA pressure (SPAP) (-8.2 ± 12.8, P = 0.003), RV end-diastolic pressure (RVEDP) (-2.1 ± 2.8, P < 0.001) and RV diastolic pressure gradient (RVDPG) (-1.7 ± 1.4, P < 0.001) after 17 ± 9 minutes of iE&iM administration. Patients also had a significant increase in RV outflow tract (RVOT) gradient (3.7 ± 4.7, P < 0.001), RV maximal rate of pressure rise during early systole (dP/dt max) (68.3 ± 144.7, P = 0.024), and left ventricular (LV) dP/dt max (66.4 ± 90.1, P < 0.001). Change in RVOT gradient was only observed in those with a positive pulmonary vasodilator response to treatment. Treatment with iE&iM did not present adverse effects when compared with a matched case-control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of iE&iM in cardiac surgery patients presenting with PH or signs of RV dysfunction is a safe and effective treatment approach in improving RV function. Appearance of a transient increase in RVOT gradient after iE&iM could be useful to predict response to treatment.