European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
Implications of empirical testing and treatment for atypical bacteria in patients hospitalized with COVID, influenza, or RSV: a retrospective observational cohort study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hønge Bo Langhoff, Redder Jacob, Greve Thomas, Dalgaard Lars Skov, Sørensen Anita Rath, Ebdrup Lotte, Mohey Rajesh, Tarp Britta, Holm Mette, Østergaard Lars, Storgaard Merete
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Patients admitted with viral respiratory tract infections are at risk ofbacterial co-infections that may exacerbate disease severity. Detection of atypical bacteria requires specific laboratory diagnostic modality and specific antibiotics. METHODS: In this retrospective regionwide cohort study we included all patients admitted to a hospital in the Central Denmark Region with COVID-19, influenza A, influenza B, or Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) from February 2019 to February 2024. Firstly, we investigated the number of patients testing positive for atypical bacterial co-infection. Secondly, we evaluated associations with diagnostic testing for these atypical bacteria, and the use and associations with administration of empirical treatment with clarithromycin. RESULTS: During the study period a total of 19,651 patients were admitted with one of the viral respiratory tract infections. Only 21 patients tested positive for atypical bacterial co-infection, corresponding to 0.1% of those tested (n = 2,369). Empirical clarithromycin was administered to 859 (4.4%) patients. Still 17 out of the 21 patients (81.0%) with atypical bacterial co-infection did not receive clarithromycin before the result of diagnostic test was available. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support routine testing for atypical bacterial co-infection and use of empirical treatment for atypical pneumonia in this population.