The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2012
Intravenous immunoglobulin to treat neonatal alloimmune haemolytic disease.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Corvaglia Luigi, Legnani Elena, Galletti Silvia, Arcuri Santo, Aceti Arianna, Faldella Giacomo
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and exchange transfusion (EXT) on rhesus haemolytic disease of the newborn (Rh-HDN) and evaluate treatment-related side effects.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review of two cohorts of newborns with Rh-HDN, treated with (Group 2) or without (Group 1) IVIg. Length of phototherapy, number of EXT, IVIg infusions, intrauterine and top-up red blood cells transfusions, need and permanence of umbilical venous catheter, and length of hospital stay, as well as treatment-related adverse events, were evaluated.
RESULTS: Charts of 88 newborns were reviewed (34 in Group 1, 54 in Group 2). Infants in Group 2 received a significantly lower number of EXT, had a lower risk of neurological impairment and needed an umbilical venous catheter for shorter, but required longer phototherapy, longer length of hospital stay, and more top-up transfusions. EXT was associated with a high number of adverse events. Two newborns treated with IVIg developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).
CONCLUSIONS: IVIg appear as an effective alternative to EXT, reducing the risk of neurological impairment and complications related to EXT. However, side effects of IVIg treatment (higher need of top-up transfusions and longer hospital stay) should be taken into account and the risk of NEC should be carefully monitored during treatment.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review of two cohorts of newborns with Rh-HDN, treated with (Group 2) or without (Group 1) IVIg. Length of phototherapy, number of EXT, IVIg infusions, intrauterine and top-up red blood cells transfusions, need and permanence of umbilical venous catheter, and length of hospital stay, as well as treatment-related adverse events, were evaluated.
RESULTS: Charts of 88 newborns were reviewed (34 in Group 1, 54 in Group 2). Infants in Group 2 received a significantly lower number of EXT, had a lower risk of neurological impairment and needed an umbilical venous catheter for shorter, but required longer phototherapy, longer length of hospital stay, and more top-up transfusions. EXT was associated with a high number of adverse events. Two newborns treated with IVIg developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).
CONCLUSIONS: IVIg appear as an effective alternative to EXT, reducing the risk of neurological impairment and complications related to EXT. However, side effects of IVIg treatment (higher need of top-up transfusions and longer hospital stay) should be taken into account and the risk of NEC should be carefully monitored during treatment.