Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2017
The growth of uterine myomas in untreated women: influence factors and ultrasound monitoring.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Armbrust Robert, Wernecke Klaus-Dieter, Sehouli Jalid, David Matthias
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Until now there are no systematic studies about the long-term course of myoma growth. Therefore, the aims of the present study were: (1) ultrasound monitoring of the natural course of growth of uterine leiomyomas; (2) assessment of whether the growth of myomas depends on the age of the patients, the location, or the initial size (possible co-factors/predictor criteria for increase of growth); influence of oral contraceptives (OC).
METHODS: Patient records (2010-May 2016) were retrospectively and systematically evaluated in regards to their growth and clinical course. The patients received a follow-up questionnaire by mail about the further history. Linear regression analysis and generalized regression analysis were performed to determine the influence of various factors on the growth of myomas.
RESULTS: Overall, 152 met the further inclusion criteria. Most of the myomas increased in size but 10% of the myomas became smaller without therapy. There is a significant dependency between the initial myoma size, and the first and second measurements, but not between those measures and myoma localization. In regression analysis, there was also a significant association between the growth of the myomas and the initial size but no association with age, complaint symptoms, and use of OC. However, the use of OC waas significantly associated with myoma growth in GEE.
CONCLUSIONS: The course of growth of myomas has large variance, so this should not be taken as a sign for a malignant event (sarcoma or the so-called STUMP). The growth takes place with considerable individual variability and ultimately is not predictable.
METHODS: Patient records (2010-May 2016) were retrospectively and systematically evaluated in regards to their growth and clinical course. The patients received a follow-up questionnaire by mail about the further history. Linear regression analysis and generalized regression analysis were performed to determine the influence of various factors on the growth of myomas.
RESULTS: Overall, 152 met the further inclusion criteria. Most of the myomas increased in size but 10% of the myomas became smaller without therapy. There is a significant dependency between the initial myoma size, and the first and second measurements, but not between those measures and myoma localization. In regression analysis, there was also a significant association between the growth of the myomas and the initial size but no association with age, complaint symptoms, and use of OC. However, the use of OC waas significantly associated with myoma growth in GEE.
CONCLUSIONS: The course of growth of myomas has large variance, so this should not be taken as a sign for a malignant event (sarcoma or the so-called STUMP). The growth takes place with considerable individual variability and ultimately is not predictable.