MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2147/imcrj.s112050

Медицинская библиотека · International medical case reports journal · 2016

Long-term impact after fulminant Guillain-Barré syndrome, case report and literature review.

Rougé Alain, Lemarié Jérémie, Gibot Sébastien, Bollaert Pierre Edouard

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A 47-year-old man was admitted to the intensive care unit a few hours after presenting to emergency department with acute diplopia and dysphonia. Swallowing disorders and respiratory muscular weakness quickly required invasive ventilation. On day 3, the patient was in a "brain-death"-like state with deep coma and absent brainstem reflexes. Electroencephalogram ruled out brain death diagnosis as a paradoxical sleep trace was recorded. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis, electrophysiologic studies, and a recent history of diarrhea led to the diagnosis of Campylobacter jejuni-related fulminant Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) mimicking brain death. The outcome was favorable after long Intensive Care Unit and inpatient rehabilitation stays, despite persistent disability at 9 years follow-up. This case and the associated literature review of 34 previously reported fulminant GBS patients emphasize the importance of electrophysiological investigations during clinical brain-death states with no definite cause. Fulminant GBS has a worse outcome than "standard" GBS with higher rates of severe disability (about 50%). Long-term physiotherapy and specific rehabilitation programs appear essential to improve recovery.

Для цитирования: Rougé Alain, Lemarié Jérémie, Gibot Sébastien, Bollaert Pierre Edouard. Long-term impact after fulminant Guillain-Barré syndrome, case report and literature review.. International medical case reports journal. 2016. DOI: 10.2147/imcrj.s112050.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.