MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s0034-89101996000200004

Медицинская библиотека · Revista de saude publica · 1996

[Analysis of direct immunofluorescence tests for trachoma diagnosis].

Medina N H, Gentil R M, Caraça M, Suzuki C K, Melles H H

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

For the confirmation of trachoma foci in places where no previous cases had been reported, the State Health Secretariat of S. Paulo makes provision for the realization of laboratory exams, particularly because the disease was considered to have been eradicated from the State in the seventies. During the epidemiological investigations, conjunctival scrapings were collected from the subjects with inflammatory trachoma (TF/TI), clinically diagnosed. The results of the immunofluorescence (DFA) exams were analysed in the light of the frequency of the appropriate exams and their positive results, by the quantity of elementary bodies (EB) found. A total of 385 slides were studied, the criteria for positivity being 5 or more EBs. The test's sensitivity was 19.9%. The DFA test is considered to be the best laboratorial exam to be used in field work, though it does not show a sufficient sensitivity to confirm all clinically diagnosed cases of trachoma; it can only confirm the circulation of the aetiological agent within a community. In endemic areas the clinical diagnosis continues to be the criterion for case confirmation.

Для цитирования: Medina N H, Gentil R M, Caraça M, Suzuki C K, Melles H H. [Analysis of direct immunofluorescence tests for trachoma diagnosis].. Revista de saude publica. 1996. DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89101996000200004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.