MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1067/mob.2003.264

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2003

Technology assessment of saline contrast hysterosonography.

de Kroon Cornelis D, Jansen Frank Willem, Louwé Leoni A, Dieben Sandra W M, van Houwelingen Hans C, Trimbos J Baptist

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to evaluate to which extent saline contrast hysterosonography (SCHS) is able to replace diagnostic hysteroscopy in uterine cavity evaluation in women suspected of intrauterine abnormalities.

STUDY

DESIGN

In this prospective observational study we performed SCHS instead of diagnostic hysteroscopy. Diagnostic hysteroscopy was performed in case of failed or inconclusive SCHS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess subgroups for their risk of failure and inconclusiveness.

RESULTS

Two hundred fourteen women were included consecutively. SCHS was conclusive in 180 cases (84.1%), failed in 12 (5.6%), and inconclusive in 22 (10.3%). Uterine size above 600 cm(3) was the best predictor of failure and/or inconclusiveness (positive predictive value 0.42).

CONCLUSION

SCHS was able to replace 84% of the outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopies in uterine cavity evaluation in women suspected of intrauterine abnormalities. Our study showed that diagnostic hysteroscopy can be restricted to inconclusive or failed SCHS.

Для цитирования: de Kroon Cornelis D, Jansen Frank Willem, Louwé Leoni A, Dieben Sandra W M, van Houwelingen Hans C, Trimbos J Baptist. Technology assessment of saline contrast hysterosonography.. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2003. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2003.264.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.