Intensive care medicine · 2006
Influence of infusion flow rates on central venous pressure measurements through multi-lumen central venous catheters in intensive care.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lakhal Karim, Ferrandière Martine, Lagarrigue François, Mercier Colette, Fusciardi Jacques, Laffon Marc
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To study the influence on central venous pressure (CVP), measured at the distal port, of crystalloid infusions administered through the proximal port(s) of a central venous multi-lumen catheter.
PATIENTS: Thirty-one intensive care patients.
INTERVENTIONS: CVP was measured at the distal port of a multi-lumen catheter inserted in the subclavian or internal jugular vein. Using the proximal port(s), saline (0.9%) was infused at rates varying from 2 ml/h to 14,340 ml/h.
RESULTS: CVP measured before the infusion and during infusion (after 30 s to 1 min) were not significantly different. Positive pressure ventilation with PEEP (5.6 +/- 2.5 cmH(2)O) and/or norepinephrine infusion (0.25 +/- 0.21 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) did not produce any significant change in CVP during infusion.
CONCLUSION: The administration of crystalloids at different flow rates through the proximal port(s) of a multi-lumen catheter placed in the superior vena cava does not affect CVP measurement at the distal port, even in mechanically ventilated patients or patients receiving vasopressors.
PATIENTS: Thirty-one intensive care patients.
INTERVENTIONS: CVP was measured at the distal port of a multi-lumen catheter inserted in the subclavian or internal jugular vein. Using the proximal port(s), saline (0.9%) was infused at rates varying from 2 ml/h to 14,340 ml/h.
RESULTS: CVP measured before the infusion and during infusion (after 30 s to 1 min) were not significantly different. Positive pressure ventilation with PEEP (5.6 +/- 2.5 cmH(2)O) and/or norepinephrine infusion (0.25 +/- 0.21 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) did not produce any significant change in CVP during infusion.
CONCLUSION: The administration of crystalloids at different flow rates through the proximal port(s) of a multi-lumen catheter placed in the superior vena cava does not affect CVP measurement at the distal port, even in mechanically ventilated patients or patients receiving vasopressors.