Foot & ankle international · 2013
Large and deep diabetic heel ulcers need not lead to amputation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shojaiefard Abolfazl, Khorgami Zhamak, Mohajeri-Tehrani Mohammad Reza, Larijani Bagher
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Management of large and deep heel ulcers (LDHUs) is a challenge in patients with diabetic foot lesions. We assessed outcomes of a treatment protocol to save feet with LDHUs from amputation.
METHODS: We managed LDHUs (larger than 3 cm(2)) in diabetic feet using a multidisciplinary approach consisting of medical and surgical management, including revascularization and amputation, if necessary. For deep heel infection and/or gangrene, we frequently debrided and drained the deep spaces of the heel, as needed. In patients with non-ischemic feet, we made a flap from the heel pad with a broad pedicle. When satisfactory granulation tissue covered the base of the heel and the inner surface of the flap, we sutured the heel flap to its base.
RESULTS: We managed 37 feet with LDHUs among 384 patients. Twenty-nine patients (78.4%) had neuropathy, 6 (16.2%) had ischemic diabetic feet, and 2 (5.4%) had both neuropathy and ischemia. Twelve (32.4%) had septic diabetic feet. We performed two femoropopliteal bypasses, 2 infrapopliteal bypasses, and 1 distal bypass (crural) for ischemic heel ulcers. Thirty-three of the 37 feet with heel lesions (89.2%) were salvaged using this multidisciplinary approach. These 33 LDHUs healed after 4 to 7 months (median, 6 months). Transtibial amputation was performed for 4 feet (10.8%; 2 ischemic and 2 neuropathic cases).
CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients with LDHUs can be managed with a multidisciplinary approach to prevent amputation. If necessary, deep spaces of the heel can be debrided by elevating the heel pad like a flap and then performing satisfactory reconstruction.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.
METHODS: We managed LDHUs (larger than 3 cm(2)) in diabetic feet using a multidisciplinary approach consisting of medical and surgical management, including revascularization and amputation, if necessary. For deep heel infection and/or gangrene, we frequently debrided and drained the deep spaces of the heel, as needed. In patients with non-ischemic feet, we made a flap from the heel pad with a broad pedicle. When satisfactory granulation tissue covered the base of the heel and the inner surface of the flap, we sutured the heel flap to its base.
RESULTS: We managed 37 feet with LDHUs among 384 patients. Twenty-nine patients (78.4%) had neuropathy, 6 (16.2%) had ischemic diabetic feet, and 2 (5.4%) had both neuropathy and ischemia. Twelve (32.4%) had septic diabetic feet. We performed two femoropopliteal bypasses, 2 infrapopliteal bypasses, and 1 distal bypass (crural) for ischemic heel ulcers. Thirty-three of the 37 feet with heel lesions (89.2%) were salvaged using this multidisciplinary approach. These 33 LDHUs healed after 4 to 7 months (median, 6 months). Transtibial amputation was performed for 4 feet (10.8%; 2 ischemic and 2 neuropathic cases).
CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients with LDHUs can be managed with a multidisciplinary approach to prevent amputation. If necessary, deep spaces of the heel can be debrided by elevating the heel pad like a flap and then performing satisfactory reconstruction.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.