MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/bju.70092

Медицинская библиотека · BJU international · 2025

The LaserSAFE technique for margin assessment during radical prostatectomy: a feasibility study.

Almeida-Magana Ricardo, Mendes Larissa Sena Teixeira, Dinneen Eoin, Al-Hammouri Tarek, Haider Aiman, Silvanto Anna, Freeman Alex, Roberts Nicholas, Dickinson Louise, So Chun Wah, Tandogdu Zafer, Lamb Benjamin W, Mayor Nikhil, Winkler Mathias, Ahmed Hashim, Shaw Greg

Клиническое исследование I фазыКлиническое исследование II фазыСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility of conducting a multicentre trial comparing NeuroSAFE with a novel technique based on confocal laser microscopy (LaserSAFE) and evaluate the diagnostic performance of LaserSAFE for real-time surgical margin assessment.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

This was a non-randomised, prospective feasibility study conducted at a high-volume academic UK centre (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06398470). Patients with localised prostate cancer (clinical T2-T3a N0 M0) scheduled for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and deemed unsuitable for bilateral intrafascial nerve sparing (NS) based on a multidisciplinary plan were included. LaserSAFE imaging was performed in the operating room after which the NeuroSAFE technique results guided NS decisions. Pathologists, blinded to NeuroSAFE and final histology, retrospectively evaluated LaserSAFE images. Diagnostic accuracy metrics and concordance between modalities were calculated. Feasibility was assessed based on recruitment rate and the ability to activate additional sites.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients were recruited at a single site within 12 months of recruitment start. However, expansion to additional centres was not feasible due to limitations in implementing the NeuroSAFE protocol. LaserSAFE achieved a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-1.00) and specificity of 1.00 (95% CI 0.88-1.00) for detecting positive surgical margins ≥0.5 mm. Cohen's kappa demonstrated strong agreement with NeuroSAFE and final pathology. LaserSAFE was completed within a median of 7 min, significantly shorter than the 63 min required for NeuroSAFE. Limitations include the small sample size, single-centre setting, and lack of intraoperative decision-making based on LaserSAFE findings.

CONCLUSION

While a multicentre study based on NeuroSAFE as a comparison was not achievable, LaserSAFE proved to be a rapid and accurate alternative for intraoperative margin assessment. These findings support the design of a larger trial in which NS decisions are informed by LaserSAFE, with a view to broadening access to real-time margin assessment.

Для цитирования: Almeida-Magana Ricardo, Mendes Larissa Sena Teixeira, Dinneen Eoin, Al-Hammouri Tarek, Haider Aiman, Silvanto Anna, Freeman Alex, Roberts Nicholas, Dickinson Louise, So Chun Wah, Tandogdu Zafer, Lamb Benjamin W, Mayor Nikhil, Winkler Mathias, Ahmed Hashim, Shaw Greg. The LaserSAFE technique for margin assessment during radical prostatectomy: a feasibility study.. BJU international. 2025. DOI: 10.1111/bju.70092.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.