MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017069

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ quality & safety · 2025

Optimising antibacterial utilisation in Argentine intensive care units: a quality improvement collaborative.

Jorro-Baron Facundo, Loudet Cecilia Inés, Cornistein Wanda, Suarez-Anzorena Inés, Arias-Lopez Pilar, Balasini Carina, Cabana Laura, Cunto Eleonora, Corral Pablo Rodrigo Jorge, Gibbons Luz, Guglielmino Marina, Izzo Gabriela, Lescano Marianela, Meregalli Claudia, Orlandi Cristina, Perre Fernando, Ratto Maria Elena, Rivet Mariano, Rodriguez Ana Paula, Rodriguez Viviana Monica, Vilca Becerra Jacqueline, Villegas Paula Romina, Vitar Emilse, Roberti Javier, García-Elorrio Ezequiel, COST Collaborative Group, Rodriguez Viviana

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence from antimicrobial stewardship programmes in less-resourced settings. This study aimed to improve the quality of antibacterial prescriptions by mitigating overuse and promoting the use of narrow-spectrum agents in intensive care units (ICUs) in a middle-income country.

METHODS

We established a quality improvement collaborative (QIC) model involving nine Argentine ICUs over 11 months with a 16-week baseline period (BP) and a 32-week implementation period (IP). Our intervention package included audits and feedback on antibacterial use, facility-specific treatment guidelines, antibacterial timeouts, pharmacy-based interventions and education. The intervention was delivered in two learning sessions with three action periods along with coaching support and basic quality improvement training.

RESULTS

We included 912 patients, 357 in BP and 555 in IP. The latter had higher APACHE II (17 (95% CI: 12 to 21) vs 15 (95% CI: 11 to 20), p=0.036), SOFA scores (6 (95% CI: 4 to 9) vs 5 (95% CI: 3 to 8), p=0.006), renal failure (41.6% vs 33.1%, p=0.009), sepsis (36.1% vs 31.6%, p<0.001) and septic shock (40.0% vs 33.8%, p<0.001). The days of antibacterial therapy (DOT) were similar between the groups (change in the slope from BP to IP 28.1 (95% CI: -17.4 to 73.5), p=0.2405). There were no differences in the antibacterial defined daily dose (DDD) between the groups (change in the slope from BP to IP 43.9, (95% CI: -12.3 to 100.0), p=0.1413).The rate of antibacterial de-escalation based on microbiological culture was higher during the IP (62.0% vs 45.3%, p<0.001).The infection prevention control (IPC) assessment framework was increased in eight ICUs.

CONCLUSION

Implementing an antimicrobial stewardship program in ICUs in a middle-income country via a QIC demonstrated success in improving antibacterial de-escalation based on microbiological culture results, but not on DOT or DDD. In addition, eight out of nine ICUs improved their IPC Assessment Framework Score.

Для цитирования: Jorro-Baron Facundo, Loudet Cecilia Inés, Cornistein Wanda, Suarez-Anzorena Inés, Arias-Lopez Pilar, Balasini Carina, Cabana Laura, Cunto Eleonora, Corral Pablo Rodrigo Jorge, Gibbons Luz, Guglielmino Marina, Izzo Gabriela, Lescano Marianela, Meregalli Claudia, Orlandi Cristina, Perre Fernando, Ratto Maria Elena, Rivet Mariano, Rodriguez Ana Paula, Rodriguez Viviana Monica, Vilca Becerra Jacqueline, Villegas Paula Romina, Vitar Emilse, Roberti Javier, García-Elorrio Ezequiel, COST Collaborative Group, Rodriguez Viviana. Optimising antibacterial utilisation in Argentine intensive care units: a quality improvement collaborative.. BMJ quality & safety. 2025. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017069.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.