MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of reproductive medicine · 2017

Medicolegal Review of Methotrexate Administration to Viable Intrauterine Pregnancies.

Garcia-Jasso Carlos A, Kilic Gokhan S, Wen Tony, Snyder Russell R, Jain Sangeeta, Phelps John Y

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To examine 3 legal cases in which physicians prescribed methotrexate to women with a viable intrauterine pregnancy, presumed to be ectopic, resulting in adverse fetal outcomes.

STUDY

DESIGN

We conducted an electronic literature search for legal cases using the keywords “methotrexate” and “pregnancy” in the LexisNexis legal research engine as well as an Internet-wide search using the additional keyword “verdict.” We manually searched the resultant list of identified cases and categorized the studies identified in the search by verdict, award amount, and outcome of the embryo exposed to methotrexate.

RESULTS

The monetary awards are typically greater when the embryo exposed to methotrexate lives and requires continuous medical and custodial care as compared to when the fetus dies in utero or shortly after birth.

CONCLUSION

Physicians who, with all good intentions, prescribe methotrexate to women with a viable pregnancy, presumed to be ectopic, could find them-selves liable for an adverse fetal outcome. For the benefit of patients, their unborn offspring, and the liability exposure of the physician, it is important to be very cautious when prescribing methotrexate.

Для цитирования: Garcia-Jasso Carlos A, Kilic Gokhan S, Wen Tony, Snyder Russell R, Jain Sangeeta, Phelps John Y. Medicolegal Review of Methotrexate Administration to Viable Intrauterine Pregnancies.. The Journal of reproductive medicine. 2017.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.