MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/14763141.2016.1159324

Медицинская библиотека · Sports biomechanics · 2016

Assessment of balance among adolescent track and field athletes.

Knight Adam C, Holmes Megan E, Chander Harish, Kimble Amari, Stewart Joshua Ty

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Track and field events place different demands on athletes and may have an effect on balance. This study investigated the effects of event specialty, gender, and leg dominance on balance among adolescent track and field athletes. Forty healthy adolescent track and field athletes (male = 23, female = 17) categorised into three different groups (sprinter = 20, distance runners = 13, throwers = 7) had their single leg static balance measured with the eyes open and the eyes closed using an AMTI force platform. Dependent variables included average displacement (cm) of the centre of pressure (COP) in the anterior/posterior direction and medial/lateral directions, the average velocity of the COP (cm/s) and the 95% ellipse area (cm(2)). Variables were analysed using a 3 (event specialty) × 2 (gender) × 2 (leg) ANOVA with repeated measures on the leg variable (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the average displacement of the COP in the medial/lateral direction for both the eyes open and closed condition, with the non-dominant leg demonstrating greater displacement than the dominant leg. This might increase the risk of injury for the non-dominant leg, but additional data should be collected and analysed on both dynamic balance and performance.

Для цитирования: Knight Adam C, Holmes Megan E, Chander Harish, Kimble Amari, Stewart Joshua Ty. Assessment of balance among adolescent track and field athletes.. Sports biomechanics. 2016. DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2016.1159324.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.