Clinical imaging · 2025
Comparing prostate diffusion weighted images reconstructed with a commercial deep-learning product to a deep learning phase corrected model at 1.5 T.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cochran Rory L, Bradley William R, Dhami Ranjodh S, Milshteyn Eugene, Pohl Maximilian, Ghosh Soumyadeep, Nakrour Nabih, Lan Patricia, Wang Xinzeng, Guidon Arnaud, Harisinghani Mukesh G
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine whether a new deep learning (DL) based phase corrected (DLPC) reconstruction model can enhance image quality of diffusion weighted images of the prostate acquired at 1.5 T compared to a commercially available DL based product.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective study of 30 consecutive patients undergoing conventional multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate on a single 1.5 T scanner was performed. Diffusion image datasets reconstructed with a commercially available DL product and a new DLPC model were assessed. Qualitative image assessment was performed by three board certified radiologists using a 5-point Likert scale across four features and inter-rater agreement was estimated using Gwet's AC2 statistic. Quantitative image comparison was performed by assessing SNR of acquired intermediate b-value (b = 1000 s/mm2) diffusion images. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was used to assess differences between techniques. Image noise was assessed using the edge function.
RESULTS: Median patient age was 70 years (interquartile range: 66.0-75.3). All radiologists perceived less noise and better image quality for all DLPC image sets compared to commercial DL images (p < 0.05). Significantly higher SNR was observed for the acquired intermediate b-value diffusion images reconstructed with DLPC (median SNR: 49.4 vs 27.5; p < 0.001), and mean ADC values did not significantly differ between DLPC and DL images (p = 0.63). Edge analyses demonstrated significantly reduced noise for DLPC images (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: DLPC image reconstruction of diffusion weighted prostate image datasets reduces image noise and improves SNR over a commercial DL product at 1.5 T.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective study of 30 consecutive patients undergoing conventional multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate on a single 1.5 T scanner was performed. Diffusion image datasets reconstructed with a commercially available DL product and a new DLPC model were assessed. Qualitative image assessment was performed by three board certified radiologists using a 5-point Likert scale across four features and inter-rater agreement was estimated using Gwet's AC2 statistic. Quantitative image comparison was performed by assessing SNR of acquired intermediate b-value (b = 1000 s/mm2) diffusion images. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was used to assess differences between techniques. Image noise was assessed using the edge function.
RESULTS: Median patient age was 70 years (interquartile range: 66.0-75.3). All radiologists perceived less noise and better image quality for all DLPC image sets compared to commercial DL images (p < 0.05). Significantly higher SNR was observed for the acquired intermediate b-value diffusion images reconstructed with DLPC (median SNR: 49.4 vs 27.5; p < 0.001), and mean ADC values did not significantly differ between DLPC and DL images (p = 0.63). Edge analyses demonstrated significantly reduced noise for DLPC images (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: DLPC image reconstruction of diffusion weighted prostate image datasets reduces image noise and improves SNR over a commercial DL product at 1.5 T.