Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2016
Towards Objective Voice Assessment: The Diplophonia Diagram.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aichinger Philipp, Roesner Imme, Schneider-Stickler Berit, Leonhard Matthias, Denk-Linnert Doris-Maria, Bigenzahn Wolfgang, Fuchs Anna Katharina, Hagmüller Martin, Kubin Gernot
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Diplophonia is an often misinterpreted symptom of disordered voice, and needs objectification. An audio signal processing algorithm for the detection of diplophonia is proposed. Diplophonia is produced by two distinct oscillators, which yield a profound physiological interpretation. The algorithm's performance is compared with the clinical standard parameter degree of subharmonics (DSH).
STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective study.
METHODS: A total of 50 dysphonic subjects with (28 with diplophonia and 22 without diplophonia) and 30 subjects with euphonia were included in the study. From each subject, up to five sustained phonations were recorded during rigid telescopic high-speed video laryngoscopy. A total of 185 phonations were split up into 285 analysis segments of homogeneous voice qualities. In accordance to the clinical group allocation, the considered segmental voice qualities were (1) diplophonic, (2) dysphonic without diplophonia, and (3) euphonic. The Diplophonia Diagram is a scatter plot that relates the one-oscillator synthesis quality (SQ1) to the two-oscillator synthesis quality (SQ2). Multinomial logistic regression is used to distinguish between diplophonic and nondiplophonic segments.
RESULTS: Diplophonic segments can be well distinguished from nondiplophonic segments in the Diplophonia Diagram because two-oscillator synthesis is more appropriate for imitating diplophonic signals than one-oscillator synthesis. The detection of diplophonia using the Diplophonia Diagram clearly outperforms the DSH by means of positive likelihood ratios (56.8 versus 3.6).
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of the newly proposed method for detecting diplophonia is superior to the DSH approach, which should be taken into account for future clinical and scientific work.
STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective study.
METHODS: A total of 50 dysphonic subjects with (28 with diplophonia and 22 without diplophonia) and 30 subjects with euphonia were included in the study. From each subject, up to five sustained phonations were recorded during rigid telescopic high-speed video laryngoscopy. A total of 185 phonations were split up into 285 analysis segments of homogeneous voice qualities. In accordance to the clinical group allocation, the considered segmental voice qualities were (1) diplophonic, (2) dysphonic without diplophonia, and (3) euphonic. The Diplophonia Diagram is a scatter plot that relates the one-oscillator synthesis quality (SQ1) to the two-oscillator synthesis quality (SQ2). Multinomial logistic regression is used to distinguish between diplophonic and nondiplophonic segments.
RESULTS: Diplophonic segments can be well distinguished from nondiplophonic segments in the Diplophonia Diagram because two-oscillator synthesis is more appropriate for imitating diplophonic signals than one-oscillator synthesis. The detection of diplophonia using the Diplophonia Diagram clearly outperforms the DSH by means of positive likelihood ratios (56.8 versus 3.6).
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of the newly proposed method for detecting diplophonia is superior to the DSH approach, which should be taken into account for future clinical and scientific work.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AcousticsAlgorithmsHumansLaryngoscopyLogistic ModelsMultivariate AnalysisPattern Recognition, AutomatedPhonationPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSound SpectrographyTime FactorsVideo RecordingVoice DisordersVoice Quality