MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00199

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in psychology · 2018

Is an Ideal Sense of Humor Gendered? A Cross-National Study.

Tosun Sümeyra, Faghihi Nafiseh, Vaid Jyotsna

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

To explore lay conceptions of characteristics of an ideal sense of humor as embodied in a known individual, our study examined elicited written narratives by male and female participants from three different countries of origin: United States, Iran, and Turkey. As reported in an earlier previous study with United States-based participants (Crawford and Gressley, 1991), our study also found that the embodiment of an ideal sense of humor was predominantly a male figure. This effect was more pronounced for male than for female participants but did not differ by country. Relative mention of specific humor characteristics differed by participant gender and by country of origin. Whereas all groups mentioned creativity most often as a component of an ideal sense of humor, this attribute was mentioned significantly more often by Americans than by the other two groups; hostility/sarcasm was also mentioned significantly more often by Americans than Turkish participants who mentioned it more often than Iranian participants. Caring was mentioned significantly more often by Americans and Iranians than by Turkish participants. These findings show a shared pattern of humor characteristics by gender but group differences in the relative prominence given to specific humor characteristics. Further work is needed to corroborate the group differences observed and to pinpoint their source.

Для цитирования: Tosun Sümeyra, Faghihi Nafiseh, Vaid Jyotsna. Is an Ideal Sense of Humor Gendered? A Cross-National Study.. Frontiers in psychology. 2018. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00199.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.