MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01.aog.0000232557.84791.3e

Медицинская библиотека · Obstetrics and gynecology · 2006

Trends in perinatal regionalization and the role of managed care.

Dobrez Deborah, Gerber Susan, Budetti Peter

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To describe trends in regionalization of perinatal care and identify factors that predict the extent of regionalization.

METHODS

Data were drawn for four states for every year between 1989 and 1998. Panel data models estimated the effect of managed care enrollment on site of delivery for low, very low, and extremely low birth weight neonates.

RESULTS

Strong evidence for regionalization over time was observed for North Carolina and Illinois, with little change in site of delivery in Washington. A shift from level III to level II hospitals was observed for low and very low birth weight neonates in California. Although managed care enrollment increased substantially in all four states, managed care had no effect on site of delivery; that is, the effect of managed care was near zero and not statistically significant in any state.

CONCLUSION

Evidence supports the delivery of high-risk neonates at tertiary care centers. Despite changes in site of delivery, the percentages of very low birth weight neonates delivered at level III hospitals were substantially lower than the goal of 90% set by Healthy People 2010. Financial pressures introduced by managed care cannot be blamed for the failure to meet this goal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.

Для цитирования: Dobrez Deborah, Gerber Susan, Budetti Peter. Trends in perinatal regionalization and the role of managed care.. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2006. DOI: 10.1097/01.aog.0000232557.84791.3e.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.