DOI 10.1212/nxg.0000000000000460
Somatic SLC35A2 mosaicism correlates with clinical findings in epilepsy brain tissue.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Many genetic studies of intractable epilepsy in pediatric patients primarily focus on inherited, constitutional genetic deficiencies identified in patient blood. Recently, studies have revealed somatic mosaicism associated with epilepsy in which genetic variants are present only in a subset of brain cells. We hypothesize that tissue-specific, somatic mosaicism represents an important genetic etiology in epilepsy and aim to discover somatic alterations in epilepsy-affected brain tissue.
METHODS
We have pursued a research study to identify brain somatic mosaicism, using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, in patients with treatment refractory epilepsy who have undergone surgical resection of affected brain tissue.
RESULTS
We used an integrated combination of NGS techniques and conventional approaches (radiology, histopathology, and electrophysiology) to comprehensively characterize multiple brain regions from a single patient with intractable epilepsy. We present a 3-year-old male patient with West syndrome and intractable tonic seizures in whom we identified a pathogenic frameshift somatic variant in SLC35A2, present at a range of variant allele fractions (4.2%-19.5%) in 12 different brain tissues detected by targeted sequencing. The proportion of the SLC35A2 variant correlated with severity and location of neurophysiology and neuroimaging abnormalities for each tissue.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings support the importance of tissue-based sequencing and highlight a correlation in our patient between SLC35A2 variant allele fractions and the severity of epileptogenic phenotypes in different brain tissues obtained from a grid-based resection of clinically defined epileptogenic regions.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.