m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Cancers · 2026

Assessment of Transitioning from High-Potency to Low-Potency Inhibitors in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients: The Downgrading-Impact (D-IMPACT) Project.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Abruzzese Elisabetta, Crugnola Monica, Garuffo Luca, Markovic Uros, Trawinska Malgorzata Monika, Barulli Sara, Maggi Alessandro, Galimberti Sara, Cattaneo Daniele, Sannipoli Daniele, D'Adda Mariella, Chiara Elena, Bonifacio Massimiliano, Russo Rossi Antonella Vita, Beltrami Germana, Russo Sabina, Crisà Elena, Sanpaolo Grazia, Cavazzini Francesco, Loglisci Giuseppina, Fava Carmen, Giai Valentina, Scortechini Anna Rita, Scappini Barbara, Dalmazzo Matteo, Binotto Gianni, Bocchia Monica, Facchinelli Davide, Di Veroli Ambra, Pascale Sara Pasquina, Leporace Annapaola, Bernardi Simona

Аннотация

Background: Since the advent of imatinib, more potent next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and asciminib have expanded therapeutic options for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Treatment-free remission (TFR) is an important goal in CML management, but only ~30% of patients can achieve it, leaving many on lifelong therapy. TKIs are usually used in escalating order of potency, but in patients ineligible for or failing TFR, "downgrading" to safer, lower-potency agents may be advantageous. Methods: We analyzed this strategy in 157 patients across 29 Italian CML Campus centres. Data were collected via e-forms in July 2024. Prognostic scores at diagnosis did not influence downgrading. Results: The most downgraded TKIs were nilotinib (47%) and dasatinib (37%). Imatinib was the most frequent target agent (69.7%), followed by nilotinib and bosutinib. The majority underwent downgrading during first-line therapy and most after prior dose de-escalation. Adverse events were the leading reason for downgrading (79%). Notably, in 52.6% of cases, molecular responses improved afterwards. Twenty-one patients subsequently attempted TFR, with 17 (81%) remaining treatment-free at a median follow-up of 22 months. Conclusions: These results show that, beyond the known role of de-escalation, downgrading represents a new, feasible approach to maintaining long-term control, limiting toxicity and costs, and favouring TFR.

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты