MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11606-025-09429-2

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of general internal medicine · 2025

A Novel Automated Algorithm to Identify Lung Cancer Screening from Free Text of Radiology Orders.

Rustagi Alison S, Vali Marzieh, Graham Francis J, Lum Emily N, Slatore Christopher G, Keyhani Salomeh

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer screening (LCS) is recommended for asymptomatic patients. Administrative codes for LCS may capture tests prompted by signs/symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

To validate an automated algorithm that identifies LCS among asymptomatic patients.

DESIGN

In this cross-sectional study, an algorithm was iteratively developed to identify outpatient low-dose chest CT scans via Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, search free text of radiology orders for screening terms and signs/symptoms (e.g., cough), and classify scans as screening or not.

PARTICIPANTS

National population-based sample of 4503 adults ages 65-80 in Veterans Health Affairs primary care, with detailed smoking history to identify LCS-eligible individuals (30 + pack-years, current tobacco use, or quit < 15 years prior).

MAIN MEASURES: Algorithm specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) relative to manual chart review (gold standard) on 100% of screening scans and > 10% random sample of non-screening scans.

KEY

RESULTS

Chart review was conducted on n = 335 scans. The final algorithm could not classify 22% of scans, of which 73% were non-screening; these were excluded from primary analyses. Among 842 LCS-eligible individuals, the algorithm demonstrated 97% sensitivity (95%CI 91-99%) and 79% specificity (58-93%). Only 69% (61-77%) of scans classified as LCS via administrative codes were truly screening, compared to 95% of those classified as screening via the algorithm (p < 0.001). Algorithm performance was similar regardless of LCS eligibility, with 90% PPV (84-94%) and 93% NPV (86-97%) in the overall population regardless of tobacco cigarette history.

CONCLUSIONS

An automated algorithm can accurately identify screening versus diagnostic chest imaging, a necessary step to unbiased analyses of LCS in non-randomized settings. Studies should assess the accuracy of administrative codes for LCS in other health systems.

Для цитирования: Rustagi Alison S, Vali Marzieh, Graham Francis J, Lum Emily N, Slatore Christopher G, Keyhani Salomeh. A Novel Automated Algorithm to Identify Lung Cancer Screening from Free Text of Radiology Orders.. Journal of general internal medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-09429-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.