MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.016

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of minimally invasive gynecology · 2016

Comparison of Laparoscopic Cornual Resection and Cornuotomy for Interstitial Pregnancy.

Lee Myoung-Hwa, Im Seung-Yeon, Kim Min-Kyoung, Shin So-Young, Park Won I

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic cornuotomy and cornual resection in the treatment of interstitial pregnancy.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review between 2006 and 2014 (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

SETTING

Two academic tertiary care hospitals.

PATIENTS: Seventy-five patients with interstitial pregnancy treated by laparoscopy.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN

RESULTS

In the 75 patients, 53 who underwent cornual resection and 22 who underwent cornuotomy, we evaluated operating time, changes in hemoglobin levels after surgery, the rate of major complications, and the incidence of persistent interstitial pregnancy. The mean operating time was significantly shorter for cornuotomy than for cornual resection (59.36 ± 19.32 minutes vs. 77.11 ± 23.97 minutes, respectively). Changes in hemoglobin level after the operation, rates of major complications, and the incidence of persistent interstitial pregnancy were not significantly different in the 2 surgery groups.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic cornuotomy yielded clinical results comparable to those of cornual resection. Laparoscopic cornuotomy may reduce the time of operation, and had the same incidence of persistent interstitial pregnancy as cornual resection.

Для цитирования: Lee Myoung-Hwa, Im Seung-Yeon, Kim Min-Kyoung, Shin So-Young, Park Won I. Comparison of Laparoscopic Cornual Resection and Cornuotomy for Interstitial Pregnancy.. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.