MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10815-011-9642-5

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2011

Contribution of cryopreservation in a mandatory SET policy: analysis of 5 years of application of law in an academic IVF center.

Salame Yaacoub, Devreker Fabienne, Imbert Romain, Delbaere Anne, Fontenelle Nicolas, Englert Yvon

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To analyse treatment outcomes after SET law enforcement and to evaluate the contribution of cryopreservation in a SET policy.

MATERIAL: Embryo transfer cycles performed after the law enforcement (SET period) was retrospectively compared to the cycles performed before the law enforcement (DET period).

RESULTS

Pregnancy and delivery rates after fresh transfer of SET and DET periods were comparable (31.7% versus 33.3% and 24.5% versus 26.2%, respectively, NS). Overall twin delivery rate is significantly decreased after the law enforcement (11.3% versus 22.4%, p < 0.001) but not in patients aged 36 to 39 years (20.3% versus 24%, NS). Frozen-thawed embryo cycles allowed similar cumulative pregnancy rate (30.6%, NS). Taking into account all frozen embryos still to be transferred, SET period offers a better overall pregnancy rate than the DET period (36.1% versus 32.3%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The Belgian law allowed a dramatic reduction of twin deliveries especially for patients under 39 years. Cryopreservation maintains a similar cumulative pregnancy rate.

Для цитирования: Salame Yaacoub, Devreker Fabienne, Imbert Romain, Delbaere Anne, Fontenelle Nicolas, Englert Yvon. Contribution of cryopreservation in a mandatory SET policy: analysis of 5 years of application of law in an academic IVF center.. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-011-9642-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.