MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/adc.2002.025064

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of disease in childhood · 2004

Randomised controlled trial of swaddling versus massage in the management of excessive crying in infants with cerebral injuries.

Ohgi S, Akiyama T, Arisawa K, Shigemori K

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Infants with neonatal cerebral insults are susceptible to excessive crying as a result of difficulties with self-regulation.

AIMS: To compare the effectiveness of swaddling versus massage therapy in the management of excessive crying of infants with cerebral insults.

METHODS

Randomised three-week parallel comparison of the efficacy of two intervention methods. Infants with symptoms of troublesome crying and their parents were randomly assigned to a swaddling intervention group (n = 13) or a massage intervention group (n = 12).

RESULTS

The amount of total daily crying decreased significantly in the swaddling group, but did not decrease significantly in the massage group. Infant behavioural profiles and maternal anxiety levels improved significantly in the swaddling group post-intervention. Parents in the swaddling group were more satisfied with the effectiveness of the intervention in reducing crying than parents in the massage group.

CONCLUSION

Results indicate that swaddling may be more effective than massage intervention in reducing crying in infants with cerebral injuries.

Для цитирования: Ohgi S, Akiyama T, Arisawa K, Shigemori K. Randomised controlled trial of swaddling versus massage in the management of excessive crying in infants with cerebral injuries.. Archives of disease in childhood. 2004. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2002.025064.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.