Journal of electrocardiology · 2018
Novel electrocardiographic features in carriers of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy causing sarcomeric mutations.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jalanko Mikko, Heliö Tiina, Mustonen Pirjo, Kokkonen Jorma, Huhtala Heini, Laine Mika, Jääskeläinen Pertti, Tarkiainen Mika, Lauerma Kirsi, Sipola Petri, Laakso Markku, Kuusisto Johanna, Nikus Kjell
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The sensitivity and specificity of the conventional 12-lead ECG to identify carriers of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) - causing mutations without left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) has been limited. We assessed the ability of novel electrocardiographic parameters to improve the detection of HCM mutation carriers.
METHODS: We studied 140 carriers (G+) of the TPM1-Asp175Asn or MYBPC3-Gln1061X pathogenic variants for HCM: The G+/LVH+ group (n = 98) consisted of mutation carriers with LVH and the G+/LVH- group (n = 42) without LVH. The control group consisted of 30 subjects. The standard 12-lead ECG was comprehensively analyzed and two novel ECG variables were introduced: RV1<RV2>RV3 and septal remodeling. A subset of 65 individuals underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and 2D strain echocardiography.
RESULTS: Conventional major ECG criteria were sensitive (90%) and specific (97%) in identifying G+/LVH+ subjects. RV1<RV2>RV3 and septal remodeling were more prevalent in the G+/LVH- subjects compared to the control group (33% vs 3%, p = 0.005 and 45% vs 3%, p < 0.001, respectively). The combination of RV1<RV2>RV3 and Q waves and repolarization abnormalities (QR) differentiated between the G+/LVH- subjects and the control group with a sensitivity of 52% and specificity of 97%. The combination of septal remodeling and QR differentiated between G+/LVH- subjects and the control group with a sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 97%.
CONCLUSIONS: The novel ECG-parameters RV1<RV2>RV3 and septal remodeling were effective in identifying G+/LVH- subjects and could be useful in the diagnostics of new suspected HCM patients and in the screening and follow-up of HCM families.
METHODS: We studied 140 carriers (G+) of the TPM1-Asp175Asn or MYBPC3-Gln1061X pathogenic variants for HCM: The G+/LVH+ group (n = 98) consisted of mutation carriers with LVH and the G+/LVH- group (n = 42) without LVH. The control group consisted of 30 subjects. The standard 12-lead ECG was comprehensively analyzed and two novel ECG variables were introduced: RV1<RV2>RV3 and septal remodeling. A subset of 65 individuals underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and 2D strain echocardiography.
RESULTS: Conventional major ECG criteria were sensitive (90%) and specific (97%) in identifying G+/LVH+ subjects. RV1<RV2>RV3 and septal remodeling were more prevalent in the G+/LVH- subjects compared to the control group (33% vs 3%, p = 0.005 and 45% vs 3%, p < 0.001, respectively). The combination of RV1<RV2>RV3 and Q waves and repolarization abnormalities (QR) differentiated between the G+/LVH- subjects and the control group with a sensitivity of 52% and specificity of 97%. The combination of septal remodeling and QR differentiated between G+/LVH- subjects and the control group with a sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 97%.
CONCLUSIONS: The novel ECG-parameters RV1<RV2>RV3 and septal remodeling were effective in identifying G+/LVH- subjects and could be useful in the diagnostics of new suspected HCM patients and in the screening and follow-up of HCM families.