MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.9778/cmajo.20200003

Медицинская библиотека · CMAJ open · 2020

Effectiveness of ambulation to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients admitted to hospital: a systematic review.

Lau Brandyn D, Murphy Patrick, Nastasi Anthony J, Seal Stella, Kraus Peggy S, Hobson Deborah B, Shaffer Dauryne L, Holzmueller Christine G, Aboagye Jonathan K, Streiff Michael B, Haut Elliott R

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Patient ambulation is frequently recommended to help prevent venous thromboembolism during hospital admission. Our objective was to synthesize the evidence for ambulation as a prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in hospital.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials indexed from their inception through April 2020 for studies of adult patients admitted to hospital, in which ambulation or mobilization alone or concomitant with prophylaxis was indicated for prevention of venous thromboembolism. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for unpublished trials. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Two reviewers independently screened articles and assessed risk of bias using 2 validated tools. We scored studies on quality of reporting, internal and external validity and study power; combined scores determined the overall quality.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria: 8 retrospective and 2 prospective cohorts, 7 RCTs and 1 secondary analysis of an RCT. The intervention (ambulation or mobilized) groups varied across studies. Five studies examined exercise as a therapeutic prophylaxis for thrombosis and 9 described an ambulation protocol. Five studies attempted to quantify amount and duration of patient ambulation and 3 reported ambulation distance. In the 5 studies rated as good or excellent statistical quality, findings were mixed. Incidence of venous thromboembolism was lowest when pharmacologic anticoagulants were added as part of the prescribed prophylaxis regimen.

INTERPRETATION: We did not find high-quality evidence supporting ambulation alone as an effective prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. Ambulation should not be considered an adequate prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism, nor as an adequate reason to discontinue pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism during a patient's hospital admission.

Для цитирования: Lau Brandyn D, Murphy Patrick, Nastasi Anthony J, Seal Stella, Kraus Peggy S, Hobson Deborah B, Shaffer Dauryne L, Holzmueller Christine G, Aboagye Jonathan K, Streiff Michael B, Haut Elliott R. Effectiveness of ambulation to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients admitted to hospital: a systematic review.. CMAJ open. 2020. DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.