MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi · 2015

[Factors Affecting Outcomes of Repeated Penetrating Keratoplasty].

Yamamoto Shinobu, Shimmura-Tomita Machiko, Satake Yoshiyuki, Shimazaki-Den Seika, Shimmura Shigeto, Shimazaki Jun

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To investigate prognosis for repeated penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and factors that affect the outcome.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated graft survival rates, 1-year postoperative best-corrected visual acuity and irreversible rejection rates in 108 eyes of 106 patients that had repeated PKP. Factors that might affect the outcome were, age, number of previous PKP, original diseases, history of glaucoma and rejection and the use of postoperative immunosuppressant were also studied.

RESULTS

Individual-factor analysis showed that history of rejection and postoperative immunosuppressant significantly increased the risk of postoperative rejection. Multi-factor analysis showed that graft survival rate was significantly lower among cases that had systemic immunosuppressants (steroids and cyclosporine). One year postoperative best-corrected visual acuity was significantly worse in cases that had history of glaucoma. In cases with history of rejection, systemic administration of postoperative immunosuppressants was significantly associated with postoperative irreversible rejection.

CONCLUSION

History of rejection and glaucoma tend to have poor outcome, and the outcome might not improve by postoperative immunosuppressants.

Для цитирования: Yamamoto Shinobu, Shimmura-Tomita Machiko, Satake Yoshiyuki, Shimazaki-Den Seika, Shimmura Shigeto, Shimazaki Jun. [Factors Affecting Outcomes of Repeated Penetrating Keratoplasty].. Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi. 2015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.