Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2024
Measurement of Physical Activity Using Fitness Trackers Before and After Midurethral Sling.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cope Zebulun S, Stewart J Ryan, Gupta Ankita, Hobson Deslyn T G, Warehime Jenna, Feroz Rehan, Scheidel Sarah, Meriwether Kate V, Lenger Stacy M, Gaskins Jeremy T, Sumy Sharmin, Francis Sean
Аннотация
IMPORTANCE: Urinary incontinence can be a barrier to performing physical activities for many women. A midurethral sling (MUS) has shown symptom improvement for women experiencing stress urinary incontinence (SUI), suggesting the hypothesis that physical activity rates should increase after treatment.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the change in objectively measured physical activity levels in women following placement of MUS for SUI.
STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective cohort study, patients undergoing MUS placement, with or without concomitant pelvic reconstructive surgery, were provided a commercial activity tracker. Physical activity was tracked for at least 1 week preoperatively and up to 6 months postoperatively. Participants were required to wear the tracker for at least 2 weeks in the postoperative period. The primary outcome, mean caloric daily expenditure (MCDE), was compared preoperatively and postoperatively.
RESULTS: Seventy-two patients met criteria for data inclusion. The device was worn for a mean of 18.4 ± 12.1 days preoperatively and 91.7 ± 53.3 days postoperatively. Mean participant age was 51.9 ± 9.4 years. The MCDE was significantly higher postoperatively (preoperatively: 1,673 kcal/d vs postoperatively: 2,018 kcal/d; P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in postoperative MCDE in participants who had only MUS as the primary procedure versus participants who also had a concomitant procedure (2,020 ± 216 kcal/d vs 2,015 ± 431 kcal/d; P = 0.95). Of participants with class II/III obesity, 45% had at least a 500 kcal/d increase postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of SUI with MUS is associated with a significantly greater caloric expenditure in the postoperative period.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the change in objectively measured physical activity levels in women following placement of MUS for SUI.
STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective cohort study, patients undergoing MUS placement, with or without concomitant pelvic reconstructive surgery, were provided a commercial activity tracker. Physical activity was tracked for at least 1 week preoperatively and up to 6 months postoperatively. Participants were required to wear the tracker for at least 2 weeks in the postoperative period. The primary outcome, mean caloric daily expenditure (MCDE), was compared preoperatively and postoperatively.
RESULTS: Seventy-two patients met criteria for data inclusion. The device was worn for a mean of 18.4 ± 12.1 days preoperatively and 91.7 ± 53.3 days postoperatively. Mean participant age was 51.9 ± 9.4 years. The MCDE was significantly higher postoperatively (preoperatively: 1,673 kcal/d vs postoperatively: 2,018 kcal/d; P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in postoperative MCDE in participants who had only MUS as the primary procedure versus participants who also had a concomitant procedure (2,020 ± 216 kcal/d vs 2,015 ± 431 kcal/d; P = 0.95). Of participants with class II/III obesity, 45% had at least a 500 kcal/d increase postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of SUI with MUS is associated with a significantly greater caloric expenditure in the postoperative period.