Journal of surgical oncology · 2003
Peritoneal mesothelioma treated by induction chemotherapy, cytoreductive surgery, and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Deraco Marcello, Casali Paolo, Inglese M G, Baratti Dario, Pennacchioli Elisabetta, Bertulli Rossella, Kusamura Shigeki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Peritoneal mesothelioma (PM) is a rare disease, with a poor prognosis. We decided to prospectively evaluate the prognostic impact of aggressive surgery followed by intraperitoneal chemotherapy with local hyperthermia.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 19 patients with PM were treated by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP). Mean follow-up was 27 months (range: 1-65). Fifteen (68%) patients had malignant disease, two had well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma, and two had multicystic PM. Thirteen (65%) patients received preoperative chemotherapy. Fifteen cases (75%) underwent optimal cytoreduction (residual disease <2.5 mm). One patient underwent the procedure twice due to locoregional progression. IPHP was performed with closed abdomen technique, using a preheated polysaline perfusate (42.5 degrees C) containing cisplatin + mitomycin C or cisplatin + doxorubicin administered through a heart-lung pump for 60 or 90 min.
RESULTS: Three-year overall and progression-free survival was 69 and 66%, respectively. The operative morbidity (grade II/III), mortality, and overall toxicity (grade I-IV) rates were 25, 0, and 30%, respectively. Seventeen (94%) out of 18 patients had resolution of ascites.
CONCLUSIONS: This therapeutic strategy proved feasible and was well tolerated. Early results seem promising and consistent with a potentially major impact on survival in selected patients with PM.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 19 patients with PM were treated by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP). Mean follow-up was 27 months (range: 1-65). Fifteen (68%) patients had malignant disease, two had well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma, and two had multicystic PM. Thirteen (65%) patients received preoperative chemotherapy. Fifteen cases (75%) underwent optimal cytoreduction (residual disease <2.5 mm). One patient underwent the procedure twice due to locoregional progression. IPHP was performed with closed abdomen technique, using a preheated polysaline perfusate (42.5 degrees C) containing cisplatin + mitomycin C or cisplatin + doxorubicin administered through a heart-lung pump for 60 or 90 min.
RESULTS: Three-year overall and progression-free survival was 69 and 66%, respectively. The operative morbidity (grade II/III), mortality, and overall toxicity (grade I-IV) rates were 25, 0, and 30%, respectively. Seventeen (94%) out of 18 patients had resolution of ascites.
CONCLUSIONS: This therapeutic strategy proved feasible and was well tolerated. Early results seem promising and consistent with a potentially major impact on survival in selected patients with PM.