Maturitas · 1995
Compliance with long-term oral hormonal replacement therapy.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eiken P, Kolthoff N
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To study long-term compliance with oral hormonal replacement therapy (HRT).
METHODS: A total of 151 early postmenopausal women were initially randomly allocated to three groups in a double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Fifty women received continuous combined therapy, another 50 were placed on sequential therapy, while the remaining 51 women were given placebo for 2 years with no subsequent therapy. After 2 years of the trial, the women were followed in an open investigation for a total of 8 years.
RESULTS: After 8 years, 112 (85%) women were interviewed. None of the women in the combined group had changed to other therapies (46% were still in treatment), 32% were still being treated with sequential therapy and 18% had changed to other HRTs (mainly because the women disliked the monthly bleeding induced). Of the placebo group, 18% had started HRT while 53% still did not receive any therapy. Of the women who had taken combined therapy for 5 years, 95% were still in therapy at the 8-year stage. Of the 25 women who had taken sequential therapy for 5 years, 52% continued until the 8-year stage and a further 16% received other types of HRT. The women who changed HRT switched to continuous combined therapy.
CONCLUSION: The continuous combined treatment might provide an alternative to sequential treatment in postmenopausal women to achieve high long-term compliance.
METHODS: A total of 151 early postmenopausal women were initially randomly allocated to three groups in a double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Fifty women received continuous combined therapy, another 50 were placed on sequential therapy, while the remaining 51 women were given placebo for 2 years with no subsequent therapy. After 2 years of the trial, the women were followed in an open investigation for a total of 8 years.
RESULTS: After 8 years, 112 (85%) women were interviewed. None of the women in the combined group had changed to other therapies (46% were still in treatment), 32% were still being treated with sequential therapy and 18% had changed to other HRTs (mainly because the women disliked the monthly bleeding induced). Of the placebo group, 18% had started HRT while 53% still did not receive any therapy. Of the women who had taken combined therapy for 5 years, 95% were still in therapy at the 8-year stage. Of the 25 women who had taken sequential therapy for 5 years, 52% continued until the 8-year stage and a further 16% received other types of HRT. The women who changed HRT switched to continuous combined therapy.
CONCLUSION: The continuous combined treatment might provide an alternative to sequential treatment in postmenopausal women to achieve high long-term compliance.