Journal of pediatric surgery · 2016
General endotracheal vs. non-endotracheal regional anesthesia for elective inguinal hernia surgery in very preterm neonates: A single institution experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gurria Jean, Kuo Phillip, Kao Angie, Christensen Luisa, Holterman AiXuan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Very pre-term infants (VP) at <32 weeks post menstrual age PMA have a high incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia BPD. BPD places them at risk for pulmonary-related perioperative complications from general endotracheal anesthesia GE during elective inguinal hernia repair.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was done to compare pulmonary-related perioperative risks between VP patients undergoing non-emergent inguinal hernia repair prior to NICU discharge under GE (n=58) vs regional anesthesia RA (n=37).
RESULTS: Median PMA (RA 26 vs GE 27 weeks), operative weight (RA 2.2 vs GE 2.27 kg), % with BPD, medical and surgical comorbidities, number of concurrent procedures are similar between groups, except for sac laparoscopy (0% RA vs 36% GE). Procedural anesthesia time was 40 minutes for RA vs 69 minutes for GE, (p < 0.001). GE (17%) vs RA (0%) remained intubated post op (p<0.001). Oral feeding was fully tolerated in RA (97%) vs GE (72%, p=0.002) by 48h after surgery. The statistical differences hold after regression analysis controlling for sac laparoscopy and procedure time. No difference in intraoperative or postoperative hernia complications is found.
CONCLUSION: RA is safe. RA is associated with early resumption of full feed, avoidance of prolonged mechanical intubation. We recommend a randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy of GE vs RA in VP infants undergoing elective NICU inguinal hernia repair.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II Retrospective study.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was done to compare pulmonary-related perioperative risks between VP patients undergoing non-emergent inguinal hernia repair prior to NICU discharge under GE (n=58) vs regional anesthesia RA (n=37).
RESULTS: Median PMA (RA 26 vs GE 27 weeks), operative weight (RA 2.2 vs GE 2.27 kg), % with BPD, medical and surgical comorbidities, number of concurrent procedures are similar between groups, except for sac laparoscopy (0% RA vs 36% GE). Procedural anesthesia time was 40 minutes for RA vs 69 minutes for GE, (p < 0.001). GE (17%) vs RA (0%) remained intubated post op (p<0.001). Oral feeding was fully tolerated in RA (97%) vs GE (72%, p=0.002) by 48h after surgery. The statistical differences hold after regression analysis controlling for sac laparoscopy and procedure time. No difference in intraoperative or postoperative hernia complications is found.
CONCLUSION: RA is safe. RA is associated with early resumption of full feed, avoidance of prolonged mechanical intubation. We recommend a randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy of GE vs RA in VP infants undergoing elective NICU inguinal hernia repair.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II Retrospective study.