MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2196/55316

Медицинская библиотека · JMIR formative research · 2025

Snowball Group Usability Testing for Rapid and Iterative Multisite Tool Development: Method Development Study.

Dauber-Decker Katherine L, Feldstein David, Hess Rachel, Mann Devin, Kim Eun Ji, Gautam-Goyal Pranisha, Solomon Jeffrey, Khan Sundas, Malik Fatima, Xu Lynn, Huffman Ainsley, Smith Paul D, Halm Wendy, Yuroff Alice, Richardson Safiya

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Usability testing is valuable for assessing a new tool or system's usefulness and ease-of-use. Several established methods of usability testing exist, including think-aloud testing. Although usability testing has been shown to be crucial for successful clinical decision support (CDS) tool development, it is often difficult to conduct across multisite development projects due to its time- and labor-intensiveness, cost, and the skills required to conduct the testing.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to develop a new method of usability testing that would enable efficient acquisition and dissemination of results among multiple sites. We sought to address the existing barriers to successfully completing usability testing during CDS tool development.

METHODS

We combined individual think-aloud testing and focus groups into one session and performed sessions serially across 4 sites (snowball group usability testing) to assess the usability of two CDS tools designed for use by nurses in primary and urgent care settings. We recorded each session and took notes in a standardized format. Each site shared feedback from their individual sessions with the other sites in the study so that they could incorporate that feedback into their tools prior to their own testing sessions.

RESULTS

The group testing and snowballing components of our new usability testing method proved to be highly beneficial. We identified 3 main benefits of snowball group usability testing. First, by interviewing several participants in a single session rather than individuals over the course of weeks, each site was able to quickly obtain their usability feedback. Second, combining the individualized think-aloud component with a focus group component in the same session helped study teams to more easily notice similarities in feedback among participants and to discuss and act upon suggestions efficiently. Third, conducting usability testing in series across sites allowed study teams to incorporate feedback based on previous sites' sessions prior to conducting their own testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Snowball group usability testing provides an efficient method of obtaining multisite feedback on newly developed tools and systems, while addressing barriers typically associated with traditional usability testing methods. This method can be applied to test a wide variety of tools, including CDS tools, prior to launch so that they can be efficiently optimized.

Для цитирования: Dauber-Decker Katherine L, Feldstein David, Hess Rachel, Mann Devin, Kim Eun Ji, Gautam-Goyal Pranisha, Solomon Jeffrey, Khan Sundas, Malik Fatima, Xu Lynn, Huffman Ainsley, Smith Paul D, Halm Wendy, Yuroff Alice, Richardson Safiya. Snowball Group Usability Testing for Rapid and Iterative Multisite Tool Development: Method Development Study.. JMIR formative research. 2025. DOI: 10.2196/55316.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.