Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
Adapt-on-demand: Enabling flexible and scalable adaptive radiotherapy through workflow automation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Domal Sean, Choi Min Geon, Visak Justin, Li Ruiqi, Li Taoran, Teo Boon-Keng Kevin, Zhao Xiaodong, Schmidt Matthew, Laugeman Eric, Parsons David, Park Yang Kyun, Badiyan Shahed, Sher David, Lin Mu-Han
Аннотация
PURPOSE: CT-guided adaptive radiotherapy (CTgART) offers significant clinical benefits, but its utilization is often limited by resource demands and rigid workflows. This study presents a flexible and scalable "Adapt-on-Demand" (AOD) framework that integrates the adaptive capabilities of the Varian Ethos platform with the high-throughput IGRT delivery of the Varian Halcyon, supported by automated scripting.
METHODS: We developed an end-to-end dual-platform workflow that dynamically transitions between ART and IGRT delivery based on patient needs. Key components include Eclipse Scripting API (ESAPI) automation to streamline adapted plan ingestion from the Ethos Treatment Planning and Management System (TPMS) export directory, compatibility conversion for Halcyon delivery, and ARIA chart setup. The framework was evaluated through time-efficiency analysis and longitudinal tracking of ART utilization and machine throughput. Multi-institutional deployment was also conducted to validate generalizability.
RESULTS: Automation reduced plan setup time from 45 to 8 min (p < 0.001, unpaired t-test), and direct comparison of MLC leaf positions confirmed exact agreement between Ethos-native and converted plans across all control points. ART utilization on the Ethos platform increased from 17% to 77% following IGRT offloading to Halcyon. The workflow was successfully implemented at two external sites without code modification, demonstrating portability.
CONCLUSION: This AOD framework enables flexible ART delivery without compromising workflow efficiency. By automating inter-platform transitions and alleviating adaptive system burden, it improves clinical throughput and broadens patient access to ART. This work also underscores the importance of system interoperability and provides a scalable model adaptable across diverse practice settings.
METHODS: We developed an end-to-end dual-platform workflow that dynamically transitions between ART and IGRT delivery based on patient needs. Key components include Eclipse Scripting API (ESAPI) automation to streamline adapted plan ingestion from the Ethos Treatment Planning and Management System (TPMS) export directory, compatibility conversion for Halcyon delivery, and ARIA chart setup. The framework was evaluated through time-efficiency analysis and longitudinal tracking of ART utilization and machine throughput. Multi-institutional deployment was also conducted to validate generalizability.
RESULTS: Automation reduced plan setup time from 45 to 8 min (p < 0.001, unpaired t-test), and direct comparison of MLC leaf positions confirmed exact agreement between Ethos-native and converted plans across all control points. ART utilization on the Ethos platform increased from 17% to 77% following IGRT offloading to Halcyon. The workflow was successfully implemented at two external sites without code modification, demonstrating portability.
CONCLUSION: This AOD framework enables flexible ART delivery without compromising workflow efficiency. By automating inter-platform transitions and alleviating adaptive system burden, it improves clinical throughput and broadens patient access to ART. This work also underscores the importance of system interoperability and provides a scalable model adaptable across diverse practice settings.