MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/jme.2006.019059

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of medical ethics · 2008

Informed consent in Ghana: what do participants really understand?

Hill Z, Tawiah-Agyemang C, Odei-Danso S, Kirkwood B

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To explore how subjects in a placebo-controlled vitamin A supplementation trial among Ghanaian women aged 15-45 years perceive the trial and whether they know that not all trial capsules are the same, and to identify factors associated with this knowledge.

METHODS

60 semistructured interviews and 12 focus groups were conducted to explore subjects' perceptions of the trial. Steps were taken to address areas of low comprehension, including retraining fieldworkers. 1971 trial subjects were randomly selected for a survey measuring their knowledge that not all trial capsules are the same. The subjects' fieldworkers were also interviewed about their characteristics and trial knowledge. Factors associated with knowledge were explored using multi-level modeling.

RESULTS

Although subjects knew they were taking part in research, most thought they were receiving an active and beneficial medication. Variables associated with knowledge were education and district of residence. Radio broadcasts benefited those with some schooling. Fieldworkers' characteristics were not associated with subjects' knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

Research and debate on new or improved consent procedures are urgently required, particularly for subjects with little education.

Для цитирования: Hill Z, Tawiah-Agyemang C, Odei-Danso S, Kirkwood B. Informed consent in Ghana: what do participants really understand?. Journal of medical ethics. 2008. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2006.019059.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.