Upper jejunal motility after pancreatoduodenectomy according to the type of anastomosis, pancreaticojejunal or pancreaticogastric.

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to compare upper jejunal motor patterns after Billroth II pancreatoduodenectomy according to the type of pancreatic anastomosis (pancreaticojejunostomy [PJA] or pancreaticogastrostomy [PGA]) and the presence or absence of postoperative symptoms.

STUDY

DESIGN

Manometric recordings during fasting and after a 750-kcal meal were performed in the afferent limb in 12 patients (7 PJA, 5 PGA) and in the efferent limb in 15 other patients (7 PJA, 8 PGA) with a postoperative delay of 15+/-6 days and 3.9+/-2.2 months respectively. Patient data were compared to those of 20 healthy controls.

RESULTS

During fasting, the 2 main abnormal findings were a higher incidence (p < 0.05) and a slower migration velocity (p < 0.01) of incomplete phase III by comparison with that recorded in controls. No difference for phase III was observed between the 2 surgical procedures regardless of recording site. Trimebutine, 100 mg intravenously, induced a phase III in 89% (24 of 27) of the patients. Delay of motor response varied from 5 to 10 minutes without difference between the recording site; it was less than 2 minutes in 100% of controls. Trimebutine-induced phase III showed similar propagation abnormalities to the spontaneous phase III. Duration of the fed pattern (p < 0.001) and motor index (p < 0.001) were significantly lower than in controls after the meal, in both limbs, whatever the type of anastomosis. Differences between the 2 surgical procedures were a slower migration velocity of phase III (p < 0.01) and a lower postmeal motor index (p < 0.05) in the efferent limb after PJA than after PGA. Nine of 27 patients were symptomatic. In these 9 patients, mean phase III migration velocity was slower (p < 0.001), and mean area under the postprandial curve was higher (p < 0.01) than in asymptomatic patients. Propagated clusters of contractions were only found in symptomatic patients and in the afferent limb.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with significant motor disturbances, mainly slower phase III and a reduced fed pattern, in the upper jejunum, at least during the first 3 postoperative months. Few motor differences were observed between PGA and PJA pancreatic anastomosis. A lesser occurrence of postsurgical motor anomalies does not appear to be an argument for preferring PGA to PJA.