Transplantation proceedings · 2014
Urine periostin as a biomarker of renal injury in chronic allograft nephropathy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Satirapoj B, Witoon R, Ruangkanchanasetr P, Wantanasiri P, Charoenpitakchai M, Choovichian P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) represents the main cause of renal allograft failure after transplantation. Noninvasive CAN testing is required. Periostin promotes the expression of a mesenchymal phenotype in renal tubules and is a promising urine biomarker for progressive renal injury. Information regarding periostin expression in the setting of CAN remains scarce.
METHODS: Subjects were recruited from our outpatient transplantation clinic. Random urine samples were collected from CAN patients (n = 24) and renal transplant patients with normal renal function (transplant controls, n = 18). Control samples were collected from healthy volunteers (n = 18) who had normal renal function. Urine periostin was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
RESULTS: The median urine periostin in CAN patients was significantly higher than in transplant and healthy controls (1.74 vs 0.00 vs 0.14 ng/mg creatinine, respectively; P < .001). Urine periostin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at a cutoff value of 0.152 ng/mg creatinine demonstrated the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for distinguishing CAN patients from transplant patients with normal renal function (91.7%, 77.8%, and 85.7%, respectively). In addition, urine periostin levels correlated directly with urine protein creatinine ratio (R = 0.566, P < .001) and serum creatinine (R = 0.522; P < .001), whereas inverse significant correlations were evidenced with estimated glomerular filtration rate (R = -0.431; P < .001).
CONCLUSION: The appearance of urine periostin in CAN patients but not in healthy and transplant controls underscores its value as a potential biomarker for chronic progressive renal injury in transplant recipients.
METHODS: Subjects were recruited from our outpatient transplantation clinic. Random urine samples were collected from CAN patients (n = 24) and renal transplant patients with normal renal function (transplant controls, n = 18). Control samples were collected from healthy volunteers (n = 18) who had normal renal function. Urine periostin was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
RESULTS: The median urine periostin in CAN patients was significantly higher than in transplant and healthy controls (1.74 vs 0.00 vs 0.14 ng/mg creatinine, respectively; P < .001). Urine periostin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at a cutoff value of 0.152 ng/mg creatinine demonstrated the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for distinguishing CAN patients from transplant patients with normal renal function (91.7%, 77.8%, and 85.7%, respectively). In addition, urine periostin levels correlated directly with urine protein creatinine ratio (R = 0.566, P < .001) and serum creatinine (R = 0.522; P < .001), whereas inverse significant correlations were evidenced with estimated glomerular filtration rate (R = -0.431; P < .001).
CONCLUSION: The appearance of urine periostin in CAN patients but not in healthy and transplant controls underscores its value as a potential biomarker for chronic progressive renal injury in transplant recipients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAllograftsBiomarkersBody Mass IndexCase-Control StudiesCell Adhesion MoleculesCreatinineDisease ProgressionEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleGene Expression RegulationGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHumansImmunohistochemistryKidney Failure, ChronicKidney Function TestsKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedNephritisReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity