Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
PSMA-Directed PET/MRI Enables Noninvasive Diagnosis and Prognosis in Patients with Increased PSA Levels: Results from the Prospective Randomized RAPID Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеКлиническое исследование III фазыПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hartenbach Markus, Rasul Sazan, Grubmüller Bernhard, Kramer Gero, Baltzer Pascal, Helbich Thomas, Eiber Matthias, Hartenbach Sabrina, Grahovac Marko, Susani Martin, Mazal Peter, Wadsak Wolfgang, Einspieler Holger, Weber Michael, Kenner Lukas, Haug Alexander R, Hacker Marcus
Аннотация
Systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy lacks accuracy in the primary diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and causes side effects. We investigated prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET/MRI as a less-invasive alternative for biopsy guidance and risk assessment. Methods: The RAPID study was a randomized, controlled, single-center, open-label phase 3 trial comparing the diagnostic efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI with systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. In total, 220 men with suspected PCa were randomized to either a standard (random 12-core biopsy; RB) group or an image-guided biopsy (IGB) group. Biopsy, prostatectomy histology, and follow-up visits served as references. Results: PET/MRI prospectively predicted 91 of 113 histologically verified tumors, corresponding to a sensitivity of 80.5% and a positive predictive value of 84.3%. Among tumors characterized as ISUP GG of 3 or greater (n = 60), PSMA PET/MRI prospectively detected 95% (n = 57). The IGB group demonstrated slightly higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value compared with the RB group (79.3%, 94.7%, 85.2%, 92.2% vs. 74.2%, 88.0%, 71.9%, 89.2%). Seventy-nine patients were eligible for a direct IGB and RB subanalysis, with IGB detecting 15 additional cases. PET/MRI showed high specificity (94%) and negative prediction (86%) for tumor aggressiveness. In a median follow-up period of 3 y, an aggressive course of disease was detected in 25 of 199 patients. RB correlation identified 24 patients with an ISUP GG of 3 or greater with aggressive disease development during follow-up, compared with 23 patients identified by PET/MRI. Negative prediction of both methods was comparably high at 99%; however, PET/MRI overestimated fewer patients (21) as aggressive compared with RB (34). Conclusion: PSMA-targeted PET/MRI-guided biopsy is a reliable, less invasive method for detecting and characterizing PCa in a cohort with moderately increased PSA values, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies and provides a reliable prognosis of the course of disease. These results support the integration of modern imaging techniques into clinical practice to improve the treatment of PCa.