MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60338-6

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists · 2001

Hysteroscopic findings in 344 women with recurrent spontaneous abortion.

Valli E, Zupi E, Marconi D, Vaquero E, Giovannini P, Lazzarin N, Romanini C

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of different anatomic factors in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA).

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis over 9 years (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

SETTING

University hospital-affiliated endoscopic unit.

PATIENTS: Three hundred forty-four consecutive patients with RSA and 922 controls referred for abnormal uterine bleeding.

INTERVENTION: Diagnostic hysteroscopy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS

Major and minor uterine mullerian abnormalities (septate, unicornuate uteri) were found significantly more often in women with RSA than in controls (32% vs 6%, p <0.001). The frequency of acquired uterine anomalies (submucous myomas, polyps) was significantly higher in controls (32% vs 9%, p <0.001). No significant differences were observed between groups in frequency of adhesions (4% vs 2%).

CONCLUSION

Major mullerian uterine abnormalities are associated with RSA, and minor uterine anomalies may be correlated with an increased risk of recurrent miscarriage.

Для цитирования: Valli E, Zupi E, Marconi D, Vaquero E, Giovannini P, Lazzarin N, Romanini C. Hysteroscopic findings in 344 women with recurrent spontaneous abortion.. The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. 2001. DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60338-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.