MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/keu303

Медицинская библиотека · Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2014

Mortality in patients with giant cell arteritis.

Baslund Bo, Helleberg Marie, Faurschou Mikkel, Obel Niels

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine whether GCA is associated with increased mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study including all individuals who between 1993 and 2011 were registered in the Danish National Hospital Register and the Danish Pathology Register with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of GCA (n = 1787). Through the Danish Civil Registration System we identified a comparison cohort of 33 953 persons from the background population, individually matched on age and sex. Data on causes of death were obtained from the Danish Registry of Causes of Death. We used Poisson regression to determine mortality rate ratios as estimates of relative risk of death and specific causes of death.

RESULTS

Compared with the general population, the relative risk (RR) of death in patients diagnosed with GCA was 1.17 (95% CI 1.01, 1.36) and 1.22 (95% CI 1.05, 1.41) 0-2 years and >10 years after diagnosis, respectively, whereas we observed no increased mortality during the follow-up period of 2-10 years [RR 0.96 (95% CI 0.88, 1.05)]. The increased mortality during the first 2 years of follow-up was mainly due to diseases of the circulatory system, including aortic aneurisms.

CONCLUSION

GCA is associated with slightly increased early and late mortality.

Для цитирования: Baslund Bo, Helleberg Marie, Faurschou Mikkel, Obel Niels. Mortality in patients with giant cell arteritis.. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2014. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu303.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.