MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.12.020

Медицинская библиотека · Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2016

Comparison of Different Methods of Valsalva Maneuver for Right-to-left Shunt Detection by Contrast-Enhanced Transcranial Doppler.

Guo Yu-Zhu, Gao Yong-Sheng, Guo Zhen-Ni, Niu Peng-Peng, Yang Yi, Xing Ying-Qi

Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We evaluated 298 patients for right-to-left shunt (RLS) detection by contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler at rest state (RS), during the conventional Valsalva maneuver (CM), and during the modified Valsalva maneuver (BM: blowing into the connecting tube of a sphygmomanometer at 40 mm Hg for 10 s) in random order, and the degree of RLS along the time of the first microbubble occurrence was recorded. The positive rates were 21.8%, 36.9% and 47.3% for RS, CM and BM, respectively (p < 0.001). BM resulted in a significantly higher positive rate (p = 0.010), and there was a significant difference between the two different methods of VM in terms of the degree of RLS detection (p < 0.001). Further, the first microbubble occurred later during BM than CM (10.22 ± 3.77 s vs. 9.44 ± 4.36 s, p < 0.05). This modified maneuver is an alternative to the conventional one, especially for those who cannot perform the conventional maneuver adequately, but are highly suspected of having RLS.

Для цитирования: Guo Yu-Zhu, Gao Yong-Sheng, Guo Zhen-Ni, Niu Peng-Peng, Yang Yi, Xing Ying-Qi. Comparison of Different Methods of Valsalva Maneuver for Right-to-left Shunt Detection by Contrast-Enhanced Transcranial Doppler.. Ultrasound in medicine & biology. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.12.020.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.