MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890180020007

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery · 1996

Laryngeal dyskinesia as a cause of stridor in infants.

Denoyelle F, Garabedian E N, Roger G, Tashjian G

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To describe 9 cases of stridor attributed to the failure of the vocal cord to abduct during inspiration.

DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

Pediatric otolaryngology referral center.

PATIENTS: Nine hospitalized infants, aged 1 to 13 months, presented over a 3-year period for exploration of inspiratory stridor that was attributed to a condition that we have termed laryngeal dyskinesia.

RESULTS

A consistent clinical presentation was noted in all cases. The laryngeal dyskinesia occurred during calm breathing, crying, or sleep and was associated with gastroesophageal reflux in 8 cases (diagnosed clinically and/or with pH monitoring). In addition, 3 infants suffered from fainting spells associated with vagal hypertonia that was confirmed by 24-hour Holter monitoring. True paralysis of the abductor muscles was ruled out in all infants because of the presence of normal glottic motion during calm breathing or induction of anesthesia. The stridor resolved between the ages of 4 and 13 months in 7 of the patients. Improvement was progressive and had no clear relationship to treatment for gastroesophageal reflux.

CONCLUSION

Laryngeal dyskinesia in infants seems to be a distinct clinical entity, frequently associated with gastroesophageal reflux.

Для цитирования: Denoyelle F, Garabedian E N, Roger G, Tashjian G. Laryngeal dyskinesia as a cause of stridor in infants.. Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery. 1996. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890180020007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.