Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2016
Robotic assisted hysterectomy in obese patients: a systematic review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Iavazzo Christos, Gkegkes Ioannis D
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Robotic hysterectomy is an alternative approach to the management of female genital tract pathology.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to evaluate the till now available literature evidence on robotic assisted hysterectomy in obese and morbidly obese patients.
RESULTS: In total, robotic assisted hysterectomy was performed on 2769 patients. The most frequent indication for robotic hysterectomy was endometrial carcinoma (1832 out of 2769 patients, 66.2 %). Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and venous thromboembolism were the most common comorbidities reported. The conversion rate to laparotomy was 92 out of 2226 patients (4.1 %). The most frequent intraoperative complications for robotic hysterectomy were gastrointestinal injury (17 out of 2769 patients, 0.6 %), haemorrhage (five out of 2769 patients, 0.2 %) and bladder injury (five out of 2769 patients, 0.2 %). Wound infections/dehiscence (66 out of 2769 patients, 2.4 %), fever (56 out of 2769 patients, 2 %), pulmonary complications (55 out of 2769 patients, 1.9 %), urogenital complications (36 out of 2769 patients, 1.3 %) and postoperative ileus (28 out of 2769 patients, 1 %) were the most common postoperative complications. Death was reported in three out of 2769 patients (0.1 %). The ICU admitted patients were eight of 2226 patients (0.4 %).
CONCLUSION: The robotic technique, especially in obese, can optimize the surgical approach and recovery of such patients with equally if not better outcomes compared to open and/or laparoscopic techniques.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to evaluate the till now available literature evidence on robotic assisted hysterectomy in obese and morbidly obese patients.
RESULTS: In total, robotic assisted hysterectomy was performed on 2769 patients. The most frequent indication for robotic hysterectomy was endometrial carcinoma (1832 out of 2769 patients, 66.2 %). Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and venous thromboembolism were the most common comorbidities reported. The conversion rate to laparotomy was 92 out of 2226 patients (4.1 %). The most frequent intraoperative complications for robotic hysterectomy were gastrointestinal injury (17 out of 2769 patients, 0.6 %), haemorrhage (five out of 2769 patients, 0.2 %) and bladder injury (five out of 2769 patients, 0.2 %). Wound infections/dehiscence (66 out of 2769 patients, 2.4 %), fever (56 out of 2769 patients, 2 %), pulmonary complications (55 out of 2769 patients, 1.9 %), urogenital complications (36 out of 2769 patients, 1.3 %) and postoperative ileus (28 out of 2769 patients, 1 %) were the most common postoperative complications. Death was reported in three out of 2769 patients (0.1 %). The ICU admitted patients were eight of 2226 patients (0.4 %).
CONCLUSION: The robotic technique, especially in obese, can optimize the surgical approach and recovery of such patients with equally if not better outcomes compared to open and/or laparoscopic techniques.