MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1054/midw.2002.0332

Медицинская библиотека · Midwifery · 2003

Midwives' knowledge of, attitudes to and practice with baby walkers.

Woods Amanda J, Hapgood Rhydian, Colier Jacqueline, Kendrick Denise, Watts Kim, Illinworth Rachel

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

to determine community midwives' knowledge, attitudes and practice with regard to baby walkers.

DESIGN

survey, using questionnaires.

SETTING

primary care, East Midlands, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-five community midwives participating in a cluster randomised controlled trial to reduce baby walker use.

FINDINGS: there was a 94% response. Seventy per cent of the midwives, felt that it was part of their role to discuss baby walkers, and 62% felt that giving advice about walkers before birth acceptable. The midwives had a limited knowledge of baby walker injury risk and only one midwife had any baby walker-related health education material. Three attitude scales were computed and indicated that the midwives held a negative view of baby walkers and were positive about baby walker health education, believing that parents hold a positive attitude to baby walkers. Those midwives who had used a walker with their own children were more positive about baby walkers and less positive about baby walker health education.

KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: midwives are willing to be involved in baby walker health education during pregnancy. However, they require evidence-based knowledge and materials rather than relying on personal experience.

Для цитирования: Woods Amanda J, Hapgood Rhydian, Colier Jacqueline, Kendrick Denise, Watts Kim, Illinworth Rachel. Midwives' knowledge of, attitudes to and practice with baby walkers.. Midwifery. 2003. DOI: 10.1054/midw.2002.0332.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.