European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2025
Influence of socioeconomic position on surgical outcomes after resection of colorectal liver metastases.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Graaff M R, Kok N F M, Grunhagen D J, Nielen M, Marsman H A, Olde Damink Steven W M, Bosscha K, Belt E J T, Rijken A, Gobardhan P D, Nieuwenhuijs V, Mierau J O, Bruinsma J, Klaase J M, den Dulk M, scientific committee of the Dutch Hepato Biliary Audit
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study investigate the impact of socioeconomic position (SEP) on postoperative outcomes after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).
METHODS: This retrospective population-based study used data from the Dutch Hepatobiliary Audit, including all patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM, between 2014 and 2018. Neighbourhood SEP (nSEP) characteristics were obtained from Statistics Netherlands, using welfare, education, and labour participation data. The lowest 20 % defines the Low group, the top 20 % the high group. The association of nSEP with short-term postoperative outcomes and overall survival (OS) was assessed.
RESULTS: Of 3549 patients who underwent resection, 2579 (72.6 %) were successfully linked between databases. Median (IQR) nSEP scores did not significantly differ from those in the general population. Patients with higher nSEP scores had lower ASA scores (P < 0.001). No differences in 30-day mortality (1.4 % vs 1.2 % vs 1.0 %, p = 0.625) or major morbidity (10 % vs 9.7 % vs 11 %, p = 0.809) were observed between low, medium, or high nSEP. 5-year OS rates were similar: low, 45.7 % (41.4-50.4), medium, 45.9 % (43.3-48.6), high, 50.9 % (46.6-55.7), P-log rank = 0.441.
CONCLUSION: In patients selected for resection of CRLM, nSEP was not associated with postoperative outcomes or survival. Patients should not be withheld from liver resection for CRLM based on SEP.
METHODS: This retrospective population-based study used data from the Dutch Hepatobiliary Audit, including all patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM, between 2014 and 2018. Neighbourhood SEP (nSEP) characteristics were obtained from Statistics Netherlands, using welfare, education, and labour participation data. The lowest 20 % defines the Low group, the top 20 % the high group. The association of nSEP with short-term postoperative outcomes and overall survival (OS) was assessed.
RESULTS: Of 3549 patients who underwent resection, 2579 (72.6 %) were successfully linked between databases. Median (IQR) nSEP scores did not significantly differ from those in the general population. Patients with higher nSEP scores had lower ASA scores (P < 0.001). No differences in 30-day mortality (1.4 % vs 1.2 % vs 1.0 %, p = 0.625) or major morbidity (10 % vs 9.7 % vs 11 %, p = 0.809) were observed between low, medium, or high nSEP. 5-year OS rates were similar: low, 45.7 % (41.4-50.4), medium, 45.9 % (43.3-48.6), high, 50.9 % (46.6-55.7), P-log rank = 0.441.
CONCLUSION: In patients selected for resection of CRLM, nSEP was not associated with postoperative outcomes or survival. Patients should not be withheld from liver resection for CRLM based on SEP.