Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
Efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam versus other antimicrobial agents for treating multidrug- resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a propensity-matched retrospective analysis.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Qian Qian, Wei JiaChen, Xu Fei, Qin XinYu, Ji Pei, Jing ChuWei, Miao ShuMei, Sun WenKui
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA) is a life-threatening infection with limited treatment options. As a novel combination drug of cephalosporin and beta-lactamase inhibitor, ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) is not much used in clinical treatment of MDRPA infections. To fill in this knowledge gap, a single-center real-world study was conducted.
METHODS: This single-center retrospective observational study included MDRPA-infected patients treated with CAZ/AVI or other antimicrobial agents between January 2019 and April 2021. Propensity score-matched and binary logistic regression analysis was used to compare the clinical and microbiological efficacy between CAZ/AVI and other antimicrobial agents.
RESULTS: Totally 363 patients with MDRPA infection were enrolled, including 49 patients treated with CAZ/AVI and 314 patients treated with other antimicrobial agents. The CAZ/AVI group exhibited a reduced failure rate of clinical treatment (P = 0.012, OR = 0.381, 95% CI 0.180 - 0.807). Subgroup analysis showed single lung infection was a significant risk factor for clinical treatment failure in patients treated with other antimicrobial agents (P = 0.023, OR = 2.568, 95% CI 1.138 - 5.796). No significant discrepancy was observed in microbiological efficacy between the two groups (P = 0.159, OR = 0.587, 95% CI 0.280 - 1.232), or in clinical and microbiological efficacy between CAZ/AVI monotherapy and combination therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: CAZ/AVI demonstrates superior clinical efficacy against MDRPA in comparison to other antimicrobial agents. However, the administration of CAZ/AVI as part of combination therapy does not provide any clear benefits over monotherapy. Patients with single pulmonary infection caused by MDRPA show better clinical efficacy with CAZ/AVI. Further larger studies are needed to substantiate our findings.
METHODS: This single-center retrospective observational study included MDRPA-infected patients treated with CAZ/AVI or other antimicrobial agents between January 2019 and April 2021. Propensity score-matched and binary logistic regression analysis was used to compare the clinical and microbiological efficacy between CAZ/AVI and other antimicrobial agents.
RESULTS: Totally 363 patients with MDRPA infection were enrolled, including 49 patients treated with CAZ/AVI and 314 patients treated with other antimicrobial agents. The CAZ/AVI group exhibited a reduced failure rate of clinical treatment (P = 0.012, OR = 0.381, 95% CI 0.180 - 0.807). Subgroup analysis showed single lung infection was a significant risk factor for clinical treatment failure in patients treated with other antimicrobial agents (P = 0.023, OR = 2.568, 95% CI 1.138 - 5.796). No significant discrepancy was observed in microbiological efficacy between the two groups (P = 0.159, OR = 0.587, 95% CI 0.280 - 1.232), or in clinical and microbiological efficacy between CAZ/AVI monotherapy and combination therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: CAZ/AVI demonstrates superior clinical efficacy against MDRPA in comparison to other antimicrobial agents. However, the administration of CAZ/AVI as part of combination therapy does not provide any clear benefits over monotherapy. Patients with single pulmonary infection caused by MDRPA show better clinical efficacy with CAZ/AVI. Further larger studies are needed to substantiate our findings.