Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2015
Efficacy Profile of Intracameral Amphotericin B. The Often Forgotten Step.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sharma Bhavana, Kataria Preeti, Anand Reena, Gupta Rachna, Kumar Kavita, Kumar Salil, Gupta Richa
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to assess visual and structural outcomes in mycotic keratitis after conventional treatment (topical and systemic antifungals) and intracameral amphotericin B (ICAMB), and to evaluate any complications.
DESIGN: This was a prospective, nonrandomized, nonblinded interventional study.
METHODS: This study was conducted on 104 eyes of 104 patients with fungal corneal ulcers. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: group A, who received conventional topical and systemic antifungal medications, and group B, who received ICAMB in the dose of 5 to 10 μg in 1 mL of 5% dextrose. Response to treatment was evaluated. Results of the 2 groups were compared with appropriate statistical indices.
RESULTS: The mean final visual acuity in patients in group B receiving ICAMB was 1.22 ± 0.31 logMAR units. The improvement in mean visual acuity was 1.40 ± 0.2 logMAR units. In group A, mean visual outcome was 1.25 ± 0.73 logMAR units. There was an improvement by 0.55 ± 0.30 logMAR units. Healing with varying degrees of opacification occurred in a significant number of patients (81.48%) treated with ICAMB as compared with conventional treatment (Z = 2.24, P < 0.05). Complications, such as sloughing, occurred in significantly fewer patients treated with ICAMB as compared with conventional treatment (Z = 2.29, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In cases of keratomycosis where response to local and systemic antifungal treatment is not evident after 7 days, ICAMB can be safely administered to prevent the progression of ulcers and the development of complications.
DESIGN: This was a prospective, nonrandomized, nonblinded interventional study.
METHODS: This study was conducted on 104 eyes of 104 patients with fungal corneal ulcers. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: group A, who received conventional topical and systemic antifungal medications, and group B, who received ICAMB in the dose of 5 to 10 μg in 1 mL of 5% dextrose. Response to treatment was evaluated. Results of the 2 groups were compared with appropriate statistical indices.
RESULTS: The mean final visual acuity in patients in group B receiving ICAMB was 1.22 ± 0.31 logMAR units. The improvement in mean visual acuity was 1.40 ± 0.2 logMAR units. In group A, mean visual outcome was 1.25 ± 0.73 logMAR units. There was an improvement by 0.55 ± 0.30 logMAR units. Healing with varying degrees of opacification occurred in a significant number of patients (81.48%) treated with ICAMB as compared with conventional treatment (Z = 2.24, P < 0.05). Complications, such as sloughing, occurred in significantly fewer patients treated with ICAMB as compared with conventional treatment (Z = 2.29, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In cases of keratomycosis where response to local and systemic antifungal treatment is not evident after 7 days, ICAMB can be safely administered to prevent the progression of ulcers and the development of complications.