Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2020
Absence of BRAFV600E immunohistochemical expression in sporadic odontogenic keratocyst, syndromic odontogenic keratocyst and orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jain Kejal S, Bodhankar Kshitija, Desai Rajiv S, Bansal Shivani, Shirsat Pankaj, Prasad Pooja, Shah Aakruti
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) is a unique developmental odontogenic cyst that has the potential to behave aggressively and is associated with the nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome. Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst (OOC) is a distinct, uncommon odontogenic cyst. It significantly differs from OKC not only in its epithelial lining but also in proliferating kinetics, clinical, immunohistochemical and biological behaviour. BRAF gene located on chromosome 7q34 encodes a cytoplasmic serine-threonine kinase. Various immunohistochemical studies have been conducted to express the BRAFV600E gene mutation in various odontogenic cyst and tumours with varying results. The present study was conducted to evaluate the possible role of BRAFV600E in the pathogenesis of sporadic OKC, syndromic OKC and OOC by immunohistochemistry.
METHODS: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks of 15 diagnosed cases each of sporadic OKC, syndromic OKC and OOC were retrieved from the archives of Department of Oral Pathology and subjected to immunohistochemical staining for the detection of BRAFV600E mutation using a novel rabbit monoclonal antibody clone RM8.
RESULTS: Immunohistochemical analysis showed complete absence of BRAFV600E mutation in all cases of sporadic OKC, syndromic OKC and OOC.
CONCLUSION: The negative immunohistochemical expression of BRAFV600E in sporadic OKC, syndromic OKC and OOC suggests that BRAFV600E plays no role in the pathogenesis of sporadic OKC, syndromic OKC and OOC.
METHODS: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks of 15 diagnosed cases each of sporadic OKC, syndromic OKC and OOC were retrieved from the archives of Department of Oral Pathology and subjected to immunohistochemical staining for the detection of BRAFV600E mutation using a novel rabbit monoclonal antibody clone RM8.
RESULTS: Immunohistochemical analysis showed complete absence of BRAFV600E mutation in all cases of sporadic OKC, syndromic OKC and OOC.
CONCLUSION: The negative immunohistochemical expression of BRAFV600E in sporadic OKC, syndromic OKC and OOC suggests that BRAFV600E plays no role in the pathogenesis of sporadic OKC, syndromic OKC and OOC.