The Journal of reproductive medicine · 2016
Successful Laparoscopic Management of Type I Cesarean Scar Pregnancy A Case Series.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fan Jia-Ying, Xie Jing-Ying, Lu Yan-Ling, Yang Yan, Chen Yun-Qing, Han Yu-Bin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy of laparoscopic surgery without auxiliary treatment for type II cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP-II).
STUDY DESIGN: This was a case series of 7 patients with CSP-II who underwent laparoscopic surgery without auxiliary treatment between April 2014 and April 2015. All cases were diagnosed by ultrasound, confirmed by laparoscopy, and managed by laparoscopic resection of scar and gestational tissue and wound repair.
RESULTS: All 7 patients had successful surgeries without complication. Uterine scar and gestational tissues were resected, while also preserving the uterus. The operation time was 70.1 ± 16.3 min and blood loss was 65.7 ± 32.1 mL. Serum β-hCG levels 24 hours after surgery declined by 84.8 ± 9.4%. Serum β-hCG levels went back to <5 IU/L in all 7 patients by 14.4 ± 4.3 days after surgery. The time interval between surgery and first menstruation was 35.3 ± 4.5 days.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest the possibility that skilled surgeons could use laparoscopy without auxiliary pretreatment to remove gestational tissues and uterine scar defect and to repair the wound in patients with CSP-II.
STUDY DESIGN: This was a case series of 7 patients with CSP-II who underwent laparoscopic surgery without auxiliary treatment between April 2014 and April 2015. All cases were diagnosed by ultrasound, confirmed by laparoscopy, and managed by laparoscopic resection of scar and gestational tissue and wound repair.
RESULTS: All 7 patients had successful surgeries without complication. Uterine scar and gestational tissues were resected, while also preserving the uterus. The operation time was 70.1 ± 16.3 min and blood loss was 65.7 ± 32.1 mL. Serum β-hCG levels 24 hours after surgery declined by 84.8 ± 9.4%. Serum β-hCG levels went back to <5 IU/L in all 7 patients by 14.4 ± 4.3 days after surgery. The time interval between surgery and first menstruation was 35.3 ± 4.5 days.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest the possibility that skilled surgeons could use laparoscopy without auxiliary pretreatment to remove gestational tissues and uterine scar defect and to repair the wound in patients with CSP-II.