MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.04.014

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2013

Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with decreased GFR: a meta-analysis.

Wang Zhi Jian, Harjai Kishore J, Shenoy Chetan, Gao Fei, Shi Dong Mei, Liu Yu Yang, Zhao Ying Xin, Zhou Yu Jie

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is a strong predictor of both mortality and subsequent cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention. The safety and efficacy of drug-eluting (DESs) versus bare-metal stents (BMSs) in this population have not been evaluated adequately.

STUDY

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING & POPULATION: Studies involving the comparison of clinical outcomes between DESs and BMSs in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Studies exclusively involving patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were excluded.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: MEDLINE (on Ovid), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases from 2002-2013 were searched for studies comparing DESs with BMSs in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2).

INTERVENTION: DES versus BMS implantation.

OUTCOMES: Mortality, repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis.

RESULTS

Data from 26 comparative studies with 66,840 patients were included. Compared with BMSs, DESs were associated with significant reductions in repeat revascularization (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.50-0.74; P < 0.001) and myocardial infarction (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79-0.92; P < 0.001), with no detectable difference in stent thrombosis (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.46-1.12; P = 0.1). The superiority of DESs over BMSs in decreasing mortality also was documented (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65-0.90; P = 0.01). This survival benefit of DESs over BMSs was attenuated in randomized controlled trials or adjusted observational studies versus unadjusted observational studies.

LIMITATIONS: Most studies were observational studies. Meta-analysis was not performed on individual patient data.

CONCLUSIONS

DES use in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) is associated with a reduced rate of repeat revascularization and myocardial infarction without increased risk of stent thrombosis. The true effect of DESs versus BMSs on mortality needs to be confirmed by randomized controlled trials.

Для цитирования: Wang Zhi Jian, Harjai Kishore J, Shenoy Chetan, Gao Fei, Shi Dong Mei, Liu Yu Yang, Zhao Ying Xin, Zhou Yu Jie. Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with decreased GFR: a meta-analysis.. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2013. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.04.014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.