MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/wco.0b013e3282f1a043

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in neurology · 2007

Cranial base approaches to inaccessible intracranial tumors.

Monfared Ashkan, Agrawal Sumit, Jackler Robert K

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Craniotomy created through the base of the skull has improved exposure of many types of extraaxial tumors and thus enhanced both tumor control and preservation of neural function. The purpose of this article is to review recent advances in this emerging field.

RECENT FINDINGS: Use of microscopes and endoscopes has allowed these procedures to become progressively less invasive. Electrophysiological monitoring has enhanced neural identification and preservation. The increasingly documented efficacy of stereotactic radiation for certain tumor types (e.g. meningioma, schwannoma) has permitted nonoperative therapy for some individuals. In large tumors, selective use of less-than-complete microsurgical resection is establishing an increasing role, at times combined with focused radiotherapy of the surgical remnant. The role for transbasal craniotomy is well established in both benign tumors and vascular lesions, but has only limited applicability for high-grade malignant lesions. Today, the vast majority of procedures can be conducted in a single stage by a multidisciplinary team.

SUMMARY: Operative trajectories created through the cranial base, although technically demanding, have led to substantially improved outcomes for a wide variety of inaccessible intracranial lesions.

Для цитирования: Monfared Ashkan, Agrawal Sumit, Jackler Robert K. Cranial base approaches to inaccessible intracranial tumors.. Current opinion in neurology. 2007. DOI: 10.1097/wco.0b013e3282f1a043.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.