Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2000
Functional electrical stimulation effect on orthostatic hypotension after spinal cord injury.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sampson E E, Burnham R S, Andrews B J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possibility of using functional electrical stimulation (FES) to control orthostatic hypotension in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to clarify the mechanism of the response.
DESIGN: Subjects were tilted by 10 degree increments with varying intensities of lower-extremity FES. Stimulation over muscles was compared to stimulation over noncontractile sites.
SETTING: Physical therapy department of a major rehabilitation center.
PATIENTS: Six patients with SCI above T6 (3 with recent injury recruited consecutively from an inpatient spinal cord rehabilitation unit, and 3 from the community with longstanding injury, recruited as volunteers).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure, heart rate, and perceived presyncope score recorded at each tilt angle and analyzed using a multivariate analysis of variance statistical methodology.
RESULTS: Systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased with increasing stimulation intensities (systolic, p = .001; diastolic, p = .0019) and decreased with increasing angle of tilt (p < .001) regardless of the site of stimulation. Subjects tolerated higher angles of incline with electrical stimulation than without (p = .03).
CONCLUSIONS: FES causes a dose-dependent increase in blood pressure independent of stimulation site that may be useful in treating orthostatic hypotension.
DESIGN: Subjects were tilted by 10 degree increments with varying intensities of lower-extremity FES. Stimulation over muscles was compared to stimulation over noncontractile sites.
SETTING: Physical therapy department of a major rehabilitation center.
PATIENTS: Six patients with SCI above T6 (3 with recent injury recruited consecutively from an inpatient spinal cord rehabilitation unit, and 3 from the community with longstanding injury, recruited as volunteers).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure, heart rate, and perceived presyncope score recorded at each tilt angle and analyzed using a multivariate analysis of variance statistical methodology.
RESULTS: Systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased with increasing stimulation intensities (systolic, p = .001; diastolic, p = .0019) and decreased with increasing angle of tilt (p < .001) regardless of the site of stimulation. Subjects tolerated higher angles of incline with electrical stimulation than without (p = .03).
CONCLUSIONS: FES causes a dose-dependent increase in blood pressure independent of stimulation site that may be useful in treating orthostatic hypotension.